A glance at provided chart and table reveals information about exercise and absenteeism in two departments of a major company.
Shown figures of chart appeal that half of employees tend to exercise between 5 and 10 hours per week in both London and Birmingham. It also proves that in London nearly 35 percent of workers spend less than 5 hours per week, which is 20 percent more than Birmingham.
On the other hand Birmingham's employees do exercise between 10 and 15 hours weekly, compare to London's department this is nearly two times more.
About 10 percent of Both London's and Birmingham's employees equally attended in exercise more than 15 hours per week.
Given table, however, notifies remarkable information as well as the chart did with consideration of Absenteeism through illness. For instance in London 158 people of those who work for company weren't absent at all in 2012 but for Birmingham with the same situation this number was about twice with quantity of 380. 594 of employees, meanwhile, were absent between 1-5 days in a year in London which implies the greatest number in whole table. Compare to London for this situation the number drops nearly to half of this amount in Birmingham(378).
Employees regardless of location were almost equal in the case of being absent for more than 5 days with approximate number of250.
All in one the relation between exercise an d absenteeism have been covered with provided data in an astonishing quality.
A glance at provided chart and table reveals information about
exercise
and absenteeism in two departments of a major
company
.
Shown figures of chart appeal that half of
employees
tend to
exercise
between 5 and 10
hours
per week in both London and Birmingham. It
also
proves that in London
nearly
35 percent of workers spend less than 5
hours
per week, which is 20 percent more than Birmingham.
On the other hand
Birmingham's
employees
do
exercise
between 10 and 15
hours
weekly, compare to London's department this is
nearly
two times more.
About 10 percent of Both
London's
and Birmingham's
employees
equally
attended in
exercise
more than 15
hours
per week.
Given
table,
however
, notifies remarkable information
as well
as the chart did with consideration of Absenteeism through illness.
For instance
in London 158
people
of those who work for
company
weren't absent at all in 2012
but
for Birmingham with the same situation this
number
was about twice with quantity of 380. 594 of
employees
, meanwhile, were absent between 1-5 days in a year in London which implies the greatest
number
in whole table. Compare to London for this situation the
number
drops
nearly
to half of this amount in Birmingham(378).
Employees regardless of location were almost equal in the case of being absent for more than 5 days with approximate
number
of250.
All in one the relation between
exercise
an
d absenteeism have
been covered
with provided data in an astonishing quality.