Australian indigenous farming practices can be seen as a sustainable agriculture. The idea of indigenous farming is (1) care for land, water, air and the environment (Global Oneness Project, 2007). They converted land into the grasslands to "maintain" cattle, trees and fresh water supplies. (2) Effective use of land and resources. An advanced navigation management programme using fire, native flower life cycles and natural water flow has been used to ensure abundant wildlife and plant food throughout the year (J. Korff, 2020). (3) Minimizing ecological damage; using manure, ash and compost to replace the chemical fertiliser (Clickview, 2018).
This report's experimental investigation was refined by indigenous manure, ash, and compost fertilisation practices. The experiment will examine how ash as a fertiliser is a sustainable method of farming. The research question is, does Australian indigenous farming practice (using ash as a fertiliser) develop a sustainable system of crop production?
Ash is, in fact, a good source of calcium, potassium, phosphorus and magnesium, which also increases soil pH. This is a good source of many micro-nutrients needed for adequate plant growth in trace amounts (J. Gaskin, 2016). The use of synthetic pesticides or fertilisers is not included, organic farms (no chemicals used) tend to have more fertile soil, consume less energy and emit 40% less carbon dioxide and promote 30% more biodiversity than conventional farms (use of synthetic chemical fertilisers, pesticides, herbicides and other continuous inputs) (N. ZIMMERMAN, 2020).
As a development, the hypothesis is that ash as a fertiliser is one of the sustainable indigenous Australian practises, because it does less damage to soil and air quality and improves crop system productivity.
Research data from scholars of the University of Georgia and Barnard are up-to - date, written by experts in the field of research; the Sustainable Agriculture Coordinator, Crop & Soil Sciences, without bias, is considered to be reliable and valid. The hypothesis was then tested by a fair test experiment in which the only independent variable (ash) was changed while controlling (1) pot and container size, (2) the same type and amount of soil, water and plant, and (3) the environment (where the experiment occurred).
Plant A: without ash mixture in the soil
Plant B: ash mixed with soil
First, the ash was formed and mixed with the soil. Then the soil (normal and mixed with ash) was put in two pots of the same size. Each garlic clove has been placed in a pot. Both pots were then placed in the same container, containing the same amount of water, and placed at the same location.
As a result, the graph shows plant height growth over a four-day period. At the beginning, the two garlic cloves were of the same height (0 cm). Garlic cloves grown faster in mixed soil with ash (plant A) than without ash-mixed soil (plant B) within four days. Plant A sharply increased its height to 1. 3 cm, while plant B slowly increased its height to 0. 5 cm. The difference was more than twice (0. 5×2 = 1. 0). As a result, the hypothesis of using ash as a fertiliser is one of sustainable indigenous farming practices as it increases productivity and reduces damage to soil and air quality. As a result, the crop system in modern society using indigenous farming practices would increase productivity without causing much damage.
The investigation was followed by scientific expertise, such as a scientific method and a fair test. Risks of the technique, method have been identified once ash has been produced; self-harm, atmospheric pollution and plant specimen damage experiments. For this purpose, the size of the experiment was small, and only cool-down ash was used to minimise the risk.
The experiment and data collection are not reliable and valid for research purposes, as agriculture is much larger than just planting a small sample plant in a pot. It could have more variables, such as pest, water source, soil type in Australia, and weather conditions.
The low sample size of this experiment is a major limitation and therefore the evidence is limited in its ability to be used to extrapolate the findings of the experiment to a sustainable crop system in modern society.
This experiment could be improved by increasing the number of repeat readings of each sample, increasing the number of samples and running the (trial) experiment more than once. But one thing we know is that if we produce a crop system by refining Indigenous farming practices, they can maximise enough productivity while reducing production inputs such as fertilisers, especially chemical ones that harm and destroy the nature of the land.
Australian
indigenous
farming
practices
can be
seen
as a
sustainable
agriculture. The
idea
of
indigenous
farming
is (1) care for
land
,
water
, air and the environment (Global Oneness Project, 2007). They converted
land
into the grasslands to
"
maintain
"
cattle, trees and fresh
water
supplies. (2) Effective
use
of
land
and resources. An advanced navigation management
programme
using fire, native flower life cycles and natural
water
flow has been
used
to ensure abundant wildlife and
plant
food throughout the year (J.
Korff
, 2020). (3) Minimizing ecological
damage
; using manure, ash and compost to replace the
chemical
fertiliser
(
Clickview
, 2018).
This report's experimental investigation
was refined
by
indigenous
manure, ash, and compost
fertilisation
practices
. The
experiment
will examine how ash as a
fertiliser
is a
sustainable
method of
farming
. The research question is, does Australian
indigenous
farming
practice
(using ash as a
fertiliser
) develop a
sustainable
system
of
crop
production?
Ash is, in fact, a
good
source of calcium, potassium, phosphorus and magnesium, which
also
increases
soil
pH. This is a
good
source of
many
micro-nutrients needed for adequate
plant
growth in trace amounts (J.
Gaskin
, 2016). The
use
of synthetic pesticides or
fertilisers
is not included, organic farms (no
chemicals
used
) tend to have more fertile
soil
, consume less energy and emit 40% less carbon dioxide and promote 30% more biodiversity than conventional farms (
use
of synthetic
chemical
fertilisers
, pesticides, herbicides and other continuous inputs) (N. ZIMMERMAN, 2020).
As a development, the hypothesis is that ash as a
fertiliser
is one of the
sustainable
indigenous
Australian
practises
,
because
it does less
damage
to
soil
and air quality and
improves
crop
system
productivity.
Research data from scholars of the University of Georgia and Barnard are up-to
-
date, written by experts in the field of research; the
Sustainable
Agriculture Coordinator,
Crop
&
Soil
Sciences, without bias,
is considered
to be reliable and valid. The hypothesis was then
tested
by a
fair
test
experiment
in which the
only
independent variable (ash) was
changed
while controlling (1)
pot
and container
size
, (2) the same type and amount of
soil
,
water
and
plant
, and (3) the environment (where the
experiment
occurred).
Plant A: without ash mixture in the soil
Plant B: ash
mixed
with soil
First
, the ash
was formed
and
mixed
with the
soil
. Then the
soil
(normal and
mixed
with ash)
was put
in two
pots
of the same
size
. Each garlic clove has
been placed
in a
pot
. Both
pots
were then placed in the same container, containing the same amount of
water
, and placed at the same location.
As a result
, the graph
shows
plant
height
growth over a four-day period. At the beginning, the two garlic cloves were of the same
height
(0 cm). Garlic cloves grown faster in
mixed
soil
with ash
(plant
A) than without ash-mixed
soil
(plant
B) within four days.
Plant
A
sharply
increased its
height
to 1. 3 cm, while
plant
B
slowly
increased its
height
to 0. 5 cm. The difference was more than twice (0. 5×2 = 1. 0).
As a result
, the hypothesis of using ash as a
fertiliser
is one of
sustainable
indigenous
farming
practices
as it increases productivity and
reduces
damage
to
soil
and air quality.
As a result
, the
crop
system
in modern society using
indigenous
farming
practices
would increase productivity without causing much damage.
The investigation
was followed
by scientific expertise, such as a scientific method and a
fair
test
.
Risks
of the technique, method have
been identified
once ash has
been produced
; self-harm, atmospheric pollution and
plant
specimen
damage
experiments
. For this purpose, the
size
of the
experiment
was
small
, and
only
cool-down ash was
used
to
minimise
the
risk
.
The
experiment
and data collection are not reliable and valid for research purposes, as agriculture is much larger than
just
planting a
small
sample
plant
in a
pot
. It could have more variables, such as pest,
water
source,
soil
type in Australia, and weather conditions.
The low
sample
size
of this
experiment
is a major limitation and
therefore
the evidence
is limited
in its ability to be
used
to extrapolate the findings of the
experiment
to a
sustainable
crop
system
in modern society.
This
experiment
could be
improved
by increasing the number of repeat readings of each
sample
, increasing the number of
samples
and running the (trial)
experiment
more than once.
But
one thing we know is that if we produce a
crop
system
by refining
Indigenous
farming
practices
, they can
maximise
enough
productivity while reducing production inputs such as
fertilisers
,
especially
chemical
ones that harm and
destroy
the nature of the
land
.