Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Should media intrude into the private lives of celebrities. Comment

Should media intrude into the private lives of celebrities. Comment 7a33X
We are living in a society where there is a complete addiction to celebrity culture. Some people say that the media should bring every news related to the celebrities into the limelight, but some opine that intrude in the lives of celebrities is wrong. I completely agree to the fact that like everybody else, celebrities deserve a right to privacy and media should not intervene in their personal lives. I intend to discuss my views in the following paragraphs. First of all, today's media is not trustworthy at all because most if things that are shown on TV or published in magazines and tabloids about the personal lives of famous people are either highly exaggerated or absolutely false. These kinds of news are purposefully manipulated by the media personnel to get higher viewership for their channel. Which consequently leads to causing lots of controversies and disturbances in the private lives of these celebrities. The effect of fake news is not just limited to their personal lives, but also goes beyond that. For example, if a celebrity is exposed falsely for being in an extra-marital affair with his/her co-workers that not only spoils his/her personal relationships, but also brings him the social criticization from the fans, viewers or spectators. Generally, people are more interested in the lives of popular personalities and media tries to fulfil their desires by extracting as much information as possible. This kind of fabrication to satisfy the public have created a wave for themselves. For example, paparazzi puts thin, as well as superstar's life at risk just to get a flat graph. These have been so many statements about this intervention of media by celebrities that they feel extremely scared and uncomfortable due to the paparazzi, but there are no rules which can determine what actions of media are acceptable or not. To link this fact, the famous US celebrity Jennifer Lawrence interviewed in one of the TV shows that she suffered through depression and anxiety because she was too scared everytime when she stepped out of her house and crowded with millions of journalists, cameramen and other media crews. Apart from this the death of prince Diana cannot be denied which was the result of one of their encounters with the media when she was followed by them every single second of her life and one day her vehicle was crushed by speeding car following her with paparazzi. To recapitulate, privacy intrusion is not ethical because it is intentional, and should be forbidden by law. Media should know its limits and should operate within those limits so that privacy and dignity of celebrities is maintained because likewise other human, celebrities do have an emotional corner and public should respect that.
We are living in a society where there is a complete addiction to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrity
culture.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
say that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
should bring every news related to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
into the limelight,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
opine that intrude in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lives
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
. I completely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
to the fact that like everybody else,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
deserve a right to privacy and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
should not intervene in their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lives
. I intend to discuss my views in the following paragraphs.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
is not trustworthy at all
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
most if things that
are shown
on TV or published in magazines and tabloids about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lives
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are either
highly
exaggerated or
absolutely
false. These kinds of news are
purposefully
manipulated by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
personnel to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
higher viewership for their channel. Which
consequently
leads to causing lots of controversies and disturbances in the private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lives
of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
. The effect of fake news is not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
limited to their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lives
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
goes beyond that.
For example
, if a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrity
is exposed
falsely
for being in an extra-marital affair with his/her co-workers that not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
spoils his/her
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
relationships,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
brings him the social
Possible spelling mistake found.
criticization
from the fans, viewers or spectators.

Generally
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are more interested in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lives
of popular personalities and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
tries to fulfil their desires by extracting as much information as possible. This kind of fabrication to satisfy the public have created a wave for themselves.
For example
, paparazzi puts thin,
as well
as superstar's life at
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
a flat graph. These have been
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
statements about this intervention of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
that they feel
extremely
scared and uncomfortable due to the paparazzi,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
there are no
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
which can determine what actions of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
are acceptable or not.

To link this fact, the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
US
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrity
Jennifer Lawrence interviewed in one of the TV
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that she suffered through depression and anxiety
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
she was too scared
Possible spelling mistake found.
everytime
when she stepped out of her
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
and crowded with millions of journalists, cameramen and other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
crews. Apart from this the death of prince Diana cannot
be denied
which was the result of one of their encounters with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
when she
was followed
by them every single second of her life and one day her vehicle
was crushed
by speeding car following her with paparazzi.

To recapitulate, privacy intrusion is not ethical
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is intentional, and should
be forbidden
by law.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Media
should know its limits and should operate within those limits
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that privacy and dignity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
is maintained
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
likewise
other human,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
celebrities
do have an emotional corner and public should respect that.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Should media intrude into the private lives of celebrities. Comment

Academic
  American English
5 paragraphs
454 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Should media intrude into the private lives of celebrities. Comment