The given graph represents expenses on fast food in million pounds by income groups in the UK in 1990. The mostly consumed food was a hamburger. Much less eaten food was a pizza at the end of 20th century.
According to the bar chart people in the United Kingdom spent about 47 million pounds only for a hamburger with high income. Fish and chips were eaten by population of London varies by 3 million pounds from a pizza. Pizza was less consumed than fish and chips, with average income costs for a hamburger declined rapidly but expenditure on fish and chips increasedby almost 10 million pounds. Intake a hamburger significantly drop from about 33 million to nearly quarter million by low income of British people. Furthermore, a pizza went down. It was the least consumed in 1990. Fish and chips were similar in high income and low income.
It is clear from the data with high income people consumed more the hamburgers. On average income fish and chips increased. Pizza went down more in low income.
The
given
graph represents expenses on
fast
food in
million
pounds by
income
groups in the UK in 1990. The
mostly
consumed
food was a hamburger. Much less eaten food was a pizza at the
end
of 20th century.
According to the bar chart
people
in the United Kingdom spent about 47
million
pounds
only
for a hamburger with high
income
. Fish and chips
were eaten
by population of London varies by 3
million
pounds from a pizza. Pizza was less
consumed
than fish and chips, with average
income
costs for a hamburger declined
rapidly
but
expenditure on fish and chips
increasedby
almost 10
million
pounds. Intake a hamburger
significantly
drop from about 33
million
to
nearly
quarter
million
by low
income
of British
people
.
Furthermore
, a pizza went down. It was the least
consumed
in 1990. Fish and chips were similar in high
income
and low income.
It is
clear
from the data with high
income
people
consumed
more the hamburgers. On average
income
fish and chips increased. Pizza went down more in low
income
.