Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

comparison of energy consumption

comparison of energy consumption PWJLw

The charts illustrate the comparison of energy production in 1995 and 2005. Overall, Both in 1995 and 2005 the most common fuel used for energy production was coal with gas following it…. . However, the percentage of it in 1995 was 29. 80 and in 2005 it rose raised to 30. 93. In the second position in both years was gas. As for coal, the rate of gas was also increased in 2005 compared to 1995. It became 30. 31 in comparison to from the previous 29. 63. The third most used fuel, petro, however, decreased to 19. 55 which is about 10 percent less than in 2005. Nuclear is obviously is the fourth most common fuel for making/ obtaining energy. In 2005 nuclear energy was 10. 10 percent, which is by 3. 70 percent more than in 1995. The utilization of other types of material required for producing energy was only 4. 90 percent. Surprisingly, the overall percentage growth in of it was the biggest in comparison to (as opposed to) the other growth of already aforementioned fuels. In 2005, the usage of other materials was 9. 10 percent which is only by 1 percent less than the nuclear power utilized in 2005.

The charts illustrate the comparison of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 production in 1995 and 2005.

Overall
, Both in 1995 and 2005 the most common You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuel
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 production was coal with gas following it…. Don't put a space before the full stop.
.
However
, the percentage of it in 1995 was 29. 80 and in 2005 it rose raised to 30. 93.

In the second position in both years was gas. As for coal, the rate of gas was also
 increased in 2005 compared to 1995. It became 30. 31 in comparison
 to from the previous 29. 63.

The third most This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuel
, Possible spelling mistake found.metroPedroretroPetrapetrolPietro
petro
, however
, decreased to 19. 55 which is about 10 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 less than in 2005.

Nuclear is obviously
 is the fourth most common You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuel
 for making/ obtaining You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. In 2005 nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 was 10. 10 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
, which is by 3. 70 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 more than in 1995.

The utilization of other types of material required for producing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 4. 90 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. Surprisingly
, the overall
 percentage growth in of it was the biggest in comparison
 to (as opposed to) the other growth of already aforementioned You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuels
. In 2005, the usage of other materials was 9. 10 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 which is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 by 1 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 less than the nuclear power utilized in 2005. 