A lot of news channels illustrate photos of situations that people don't feel comfortable about. Although it's their responsibility to transfer a clear view about serious events, they should respect humans feeling while they are watching such these photos.
There are a lot of arguments for reporting such these images. Firstly, it's believed that just nonprofissional channels hide such these serious documentations, so it's not an easy job to convince people to keep such photos secret. Furthermore, a huge amount of money and effort are spent on such information, it would not be logical to hide them. Furthermore, although reading, or watching someone reads, a news may make you familiar bout an event, they don't transfer as clear idea as visual illustrations. We should be realistic, if these information are kept away from public, bad situation will never be changed and the justice will never be applied.
However, illustrating nonhuman photos may be a real problem. Various news programs tend to attract a huge audience using these materials as emotional manipulators. It's logical that just those which are meaningful should be displayed, yet others shouldn't. Finally, while there are children may be with their families while they're watching news, all sensitive clips containing programs has to be preceded by a caution and limited in specific period during day.
Overall, in my opinion these visuals reflect the real world and couldn't be emitted. Nevertheless, there effect on people and especially on children should be considered. Taking procedures to limit and deal with such effects is responsibility of producers themselves.
A lot of
news
channels illustrate photos of situations that
people
don't feel comfortable about. Although
it's
their responsibility to transfer a
clear
view about serious
events
, they should respect humans feeling while they are watching such these photos.
There are
a lot of
arguments for reporting such these images.
Firstly
,
it's
believed that
just
nonprofissional
channels
hide
such these serious documentations,
so
it's
not an easy job to convince
people
to
keep
such photos secret.
Furthermore
, a huge amount of money and effort
are spent
on such information, it would not be logical to
hide
them.
Furthermore
, although reading, or watching someone reads, a
news
may
make
you familiar bout an
event
, they don't transfer as
clear
idea
as visual illustrations. We should be realistic, if
these information are
kept
away from public,
bad
situation will never be
changed
and the justice will never
be applied
.
However
, illustrating nonhuman photos may be a real problem. Various
news
programs tend to attract a huge audience using these materials as emotional manipulators.
It's
logical that
just
those which are meaningful should
be displayed
,
yet
others shouldn't.
Finally
, while there are children may be with their families while they're watching
news
, all sensitive clips containing programs
has to
be preceded
by a caution and limited in specific period during day.
Overall
, in my opinion these visuals reflect the real world and couldn't
be emitted
.
Nevertheless
, there effect on
people
and
especially
on children should
be considered
. Taking procedures to limit and deal with such effects is responsibility of producers themselves.