we cannot help everyone in the world that needs helps, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? v.25
we cannot help everyone in the world that needs helps, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. with this statement? v. 25
The writer’s view, there is a hot debate over helping to the everybody that needs it to run the universe. Although, the priority in each society should attend their situation. However, I also disagree with the idea that either governments or peoples should help them at any price. For this purpose, there are different ways, like supportive and charity international and regional institution.
Firstly, it is clearly fanciful that we can help all the needy people in the run the cosmos. Further, every country or each one faces a lot of problems, and in most that the issue of deficit the budget is an important obstacle to aim for giving opportunities to people for a better life with more amenities. Should the governments or each person helps to other people in the macrocosm, it would be hard to attend their people or their life. Consequently, it could be causing problems such as expand destitute, jobless and so on.
Secondly, for helping to the people who are needing it, there are different ways that do not necessarily need government or persons. In other words, should they tend to help the other people, they would help to them by own expense. Furthermore, for this case, international and regional institutions and organization were created by a group of countries. For example, the red cross or red crescent has helped the people who hand to mouth in the run the vale. Likewise, the people have suffered from war or natural disasters. Thus, these institutions can attend the deprived people better than others.
In conclusion, as I have noted above, I believe that the useful initiative in supporting the needy people, is using international and regional supportive institution. Next, it would be wrong to use governmental aids for this purpose.
The writer’s view, there is a hot debate over helping to
the everybody
that needs it to run the universe.
Although
, the priority in each society should attend their situation.
However
, I
also
disagree with the
idea
that either
governments
or
peoples
should
help
them at any price. For this purpose, there are
different
ways, like supportive and charity international and regional institution.
Firstly
, it is
clearly
fanciful that we can
help
all the needy
people
in the run the cosmos.
Further
, every country or each one faces
a lot of
problems, and in most that the issue of deficit the budget is an
important
obstacle to aim for giving opportunities to
people
for a better life with more amenities. Should the
governments
or each person
helps
to other
people
in the macrocosm, it would be
hard
to attend their
people
or their life.
Consequently
, it could be causing problems such as expand destitute, jobless and
so
on.
Secondly
, for helping to the
people
who
are needing
it, there are
different
ways that do not
necessarily
need
government
or persons.
In other words
, should they tend to
help
the other
people
, they would
help
to them by
own
expense.
Furthermore
, for this case, international and regional institutions and organization
were created
by a group of countries.
For example
, the red cross or red crescent has
helped
the
people
who hand to mouth in the run the vale.
Likewise
, the
people
have suffered from war or natural disasters.
Thus
, these institutions can attend the deprived
people
better than others.
In conclusion
, as I have noted above, I believe that the useful initiative in supporting the needy
people
, is using international and regional supportive institution.
Next
, it would be
wrong
to
use
governmental aids for this purpose.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes