Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following appeared in a health magazine The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they d

The following appeared in a health magazine The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they d pReg2
In this passage, the author argues that citizens of Forsythe have adapted a more healthy lifestyle. To support his/her claim, he/she cites result of recent survey, sales of foods product containing kiran, and reduced sales of sulia as well. Quite reasonable though such recommendation appears at first glance, a closer scrutiny reveals that the conclusion lacks crucial supports and therefore we need to consider more evidence to help evaluate such conclusion. To start off, we need evidence to verify if there exists an improvement for citizens' eating habit. While it is shown that they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendation, no evidence serves to rule out the probability that recent survey reflects the truth of citizens' eating habit or government nutritional recommendation is the right demand for citizens' eating habit. Thus, additional evidence is needed to decide whether the result of survey is impartial and such recommendation is accurate requirement based on scientific research. If new information shows that the result of survey is blemished or officials who draft such recommendation doesn't possess sufficient knowledge or investigation for eating habit, it is reasonably safe to claim that the improvement of citizens' eating habit is groundless and his/her claim will be weakened. On the contrary, if new evidence discloses that all of aforementioned surmise could be eliminated, his/her claim will be strengthened. Furthermore, we need more evidence to ascertain whether sales of kiran could effectively lead to decline of cholesterol in citizens. First of all, while kiran might help people to ameliorate cholesterol, we need to understand whether food products produced by kiran also keep such functionality. If major ingredients have been refined and the effective elements for curing cholesterol has been greatly removed, the functionality of product to decrease cholesterol is in great doubt and his/her claim will be rendered much less advisable. Second, we need to know the reason whether citizens could take such food products or how frequently they could take as food. If it turns out that citizens seldom eat such food products after buying, we are unconvinced of the wholesome functionality mentioned above. Last but not least, despite the presence of all previous evidence, a more accurate evaluation of the author's statement regarding also requires further information. Specific evidence is needed to decide whether reduced sales of sulia represent the diminishing chances of eating them by citizens; that is to say, we need to grasp with more concrete statistics about the amount that citizens take sulia in their daily life. If the actual eating amount of sulia doesn't decrease despite its dwindling sales, his/her claim will be weakened. By constrast, if overall ingesting statistics of sulia greatly dampened as its waning sales, we are inclined to regards it as a positive signal that more citizens have stepped into healthier life. In summary, the evidence cited by the author in the argument could not provide sufficiently conclusive information to make his/her claim compelling. As a result, we need to consider more evidence to help evaluate such conclusion.
In this passage, the author argues that
citizens
of
Forsythe
have adapted a more healthy lifestyle. To support
his/her
claim
, he/she cites
result
of recent
survey
,
sales
of
foods
product
containing
kiran
, and
reduced
sales
of
sulia
as well
. Quite reasonable though such
recommendation
appears at
first
glance, a closer scrutiny reveals that the conclusion lacks crucial supports and
therefore
we
need
to consider more
evidence
to
help
evaluate such conclusion.

To
start
off, we
need
evidence
to verify if there exists an improvement for
citizens'
eating
habit
. While it
is shown
that they conform more
closely
to
government
nutritional
recommendation
, no
evidence
serves to
rule
out the probability that recent
survey
reflects the truth of
citizens'
eating
habit
or
government
nutritional
recommendation
is the right demand for
citizens'
eating
habit
.
Thus
, additional
evidence
is needed
to decide whether the
result
of
survey
is impartial and such
recommendation
is accurate requirement based on scientific research. If new information
shows
that the
result
of
survey
is blemished
or officials who draft such
recommendation
doesn't possess sufficient knowledge or investigation for
eating
habit
, it is
reasonably
safe to
claim
that the improvement of
citizens'
eating
habit
is groundless and
his/her
claim
will
be weakened
.
On the contrary
, if new
evidence
discloses that all of aforementioned surmise could
be eliminated
,
his/her
claim
will
be strengthened
.

Furthermore
, we
need
more
evidence
to ascertain whether
sales
of
kiran
could
effectively
lead to decline of cholesterol in
citizens
.
First of all
, while
kiran
might
help
people
to ameliorate cholesterol, we
need
to understand whether
food
products
produced by
kiran
also
keep
such functionality. If major ingredients have
been refined
and the effective elements for curing cholesterol has been
greatly
removed, the functionality of
product
to decrease cholesterol is in great doubt and
his/her
claim
will
be rendered
much less advisable. Second, we
need
to know the reason whether
citizens
could take such
food
products
or how
frequently
they could take as
food
. If it turns out that
citizens
seldom eat such
food
products
after buying, we
are unconvinced
of the wholesome functionality mentioned above.

Last
but
not least, despite the presence of all previous
evidence
, a more accurate evaluation of the author's statement regarding
also
requires
further
information. Specific
evidence
is needed
to decide whether
reduced
sales
of
sulia
represent the diminishing chances of
eating
them by
citizens
;
that is
to say, we
need
to grasp with more concrete statistics about the amount that
citizens
take
sulia
in their daily life. If the actual
eating
amount of
sulia
doesn't decrease despite its dwindling
sales
,
his/her
claim
will
be weakened
. By
constrast
, if
overall
ingesting statistics of
sulia
greatly
dampened as its waning
sales
, we
are inclined
to regards it as a
positive
signal that more
citizens
have stepped into healthier life.

In summary, the
evidence
cited by the author in the argument could not provide
sufficiently
conclusive information to
make
his/her
claim
compelling. As a
result
, we
need
to consider more
evidence
to
help
evaluate such conclusion.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The following appeared in a health magazine The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they d

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
501 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: