In this article, the editorial’s author concludes that hiring only people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night would assist a business to prosper. The author also cites limited anecdotal statistics regarding Mentian advertising executives to substantiate the conclusion. Close scrutiny of the evidences reveals that they lend little creditable support to the author’s conclusion.
The first problem with the study has to do with the study mentioned, in that the author hastily assumes that the sample used in this study is representative of the larger population. As you know, in research studies, the larger the sample used in the study, the more reliable and valid the findings are. As such, more information regarding the overall number of executives of the advertising firms that were studied is required in order to correctly assess the argument. Maybe the total number of individuals that were studied was significantly larger than the 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives, in which event the results of such study is neither reliable, nor valid.
Secondly, the argument relies on a known correlation between the profit margins and growth speed and the average number of hours the executives sleep per night. Yet the correlation alone amounts to scant evidence of the claimed cause-and-effect relationship. Perhaps higher profit margins and faster growth could be achieved by other factors such as training workshops for the advertisers, or superior advertising strategies implemented by the firms. In short, without establishing that no plausible factors involving the profit margins and growth speed affected the results of the previously mentioned study, I cannot accept the author’s conclusion.
Finally, the conclusion depends on another unsubstantiated assumption that hiring only people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night by itself bring higher profit margins and faster growth to the desired extent. Absent any evidence that this is the case, it is entirely possible that the recommended course of action would not suffice by itself. Unless the author supplies substantiating evidence, the conclusion lacks any merit whatsoever.
In sum, the argument is logically flawed, and therefore unconvincing. To bolster the argument, the author must firstly indicate that the sample used in the study was not only significant in size, but also representative of the larger population. In addition, the author must offer evidence regarding the correlation between the profit margins and the average number of hours the executive sleep per night. We would also need to know whether the proposed plan would suffice by itself to achieve higher profit margins and faster growth.
In this article, the editorial’s
author
concludes that hiring
only
people
who need less than 6
hours
of
sleep
per
night
would assist a business to prosper. The
author
also
cites limited anecdotal statistics regarding
Mentian
advertising
executives
to substantiate the conclusion.
Close scrutiny
of the
evidences
reveals that they lend
little
creditable support to the
author’s
conclusion.
The
first
problem with the
study
has to
do with the
study
mentioned, in that the
author
hastily
assumes that the sample
used
in this
study
is representative of the larger population. As you know, in research
studies
, the larger the sample
used
in the
study
, the more reliable and valid the findings are. As such, more information regarding the
overall
number
of
executives
of the advertising firms that
were studied
is required
in order to
correctly
assess the
argument
. Maybe the total
number
of individuals that
were studied
was
significantly
larger than the 300 male and female
Mentian
advertising
executives
, in which
event
the results of such
study
is neither reliable, nor valid.
Secondly
, the
argument
relies on a known correlation between the
profit
margins
and
growth
speed and the average
number
of
hours
the
executives
sleep
per
night
.
Yet
the correlation alone amounts to scant
evidence
of the claimed cause-and-effect relationship. Perhaps higher
profit
margins
and faster
growth
could
be achieved
by other factors such as training workshops for the advertisers, or superior advertising strategies implemented by the firms. In short, without establishing that no plausible factors involving the
profit
margins
and
growth
speed
affected
the results of the previously mentioned
study
, I cannot accept the
author’s
conclusion.
Finally
, the conclusion depends on another unsubstantiated assumption that hiring
only
people
who need less than 6
hours
of
sleep
per
night
by itself bring higher
profit
margins
and faster
growth
to the desired extent. Absent any
evidence
that this is the case, it is
entirely
possible that the recommended course of action would not suffice by itself. Unless the
author
supplies substantiating
evidence
, the conclusion lacks any merit whatsoever.
In sum, the
argument
is
logically
flawed, and
therefore
unconvincing. To bolster the
argument
, the
author
must
firstly
indicate that the sample
used
in the
study
was not
only
significant in size
,
but
also
representative of the larger population.
In addition
, the
author
must
offer
evidence
regarding the correlation between the
profit
margins
and the average
number
of
hours
the
executive
sleep
per
night
. We would
also
need to know whether the proposed plan would suffice by itself to achieve higher
profit
margins
and faster
growth
.