Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the

The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the e5wlJ
The above prompt suggests a discussion that is taking place between two competing parties who have a contradicting point of view regarding the solution proposed by the council of Maple County to curb over-development in the county. The proponents are of the view that curbing over-development would not mean that the prices of housing in Maple County will rise significantly and give the evidence of Chestnut County. On the contrary, opponents of the proposal suggest that the prices of housing will increase sharply and base their point on the observations drawn from Pine County. the council predicts that the proposed measure would lead to increase in house prices and side with the opponents of the proposal. The evidences provided by both sides seem legible during the first reading, but a close scrutiny unearths a few fallacies which might lead the council to mull over their decision again. Firstly, is the demographic setup of Maple County and Chester County the same? If it happens to be different, the comparison of Maple County with Chester County proves to be unwarranted. If the people living in Chester County are not as affluent as the ones in Maple County, then it could possibly prove why the house prices have not increased sharply in Chester County. Moreover, the measure, to be proposed at Maple County, was implemented in Chester County ten years ago. At that time, it could be possible that this measure was a viable option, but it can be a true that such a proposal would not be of the best interest for Maple County in the present scenario. Secondly, the opponents of the proposal compare Maple County with Pine County. The same question arises again. Is Pine County comparable to Maple county in terms of its demographic landscape? If this does not happen to be the case, then the comparison seems to take place between two entirely dis-similar counties. Perhaps, the spending power of the citizens of Pine County is so large that it has led to an increase in the house prices. Another possible reason could be the inefficiency of the council at Pine County to regulate the prices in housing sector that has lead to such a marked increase in the housing prices. Lastly, the council of Maple County predicts that if the proposed measure is passed, it will lead to increase in house prices in Maple County. This prediction sits upon evidences that could prove to be unwarranted and dubious and the questions raised above could well be an indication that the prediction of the council lies upon premises that have not been verified. In sum, the evidences provided by both the factions seem to be completely baseless. They seem to lend no support to the argument that are being made. Therefore, it seems hard to predict whether the proposed measure by the council would lead to an increase in house price in Maple County or no.
The above prompt suggests a discussion
that is
taking place between two competing parties who have a contradicting point of view regarding the solution
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposed
by the council of Maple County to curb over-development in the county. The proponents are of the view that curbing over-development would not mean that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of housing in Maple County will rise
significantly
and give the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidence
of Chestnut County.
On the contrary
, opponents of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposal
suggest that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of housing will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
sharply
and base their point on the observations drawn from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Pine
County.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
the
council predicts that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
measure
would
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lead
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
house
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
and side with the opponents of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposal
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidences
provided by both sides
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seem
legible during the
first
reading,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
a
Consider using "scrutiny".
close scrutiny
unearths a few fallacies which might
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lead
the council to mull over their decision again.

Firstly
, is the demographic setup of Maple County and Chester County the same? If it happens to be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
, the comparison of Maple County with Chester County proves to
be unwarranted
. If the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
living in Chester County are not as affluent as the ones in Maple County, then it could
possibly
prove why the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
house
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
have not increased
sharply
in Chester County.
Moreover
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
measure
, to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposed
at Maple County,
was implemented
in Chester County ten years ago. At that time, it could be possible that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
measure
was a viable option,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it can be a true that such a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposal
would not be of the best interest for Maple County in the present scenario.

Secondly
, the opponents of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposal
compare Maple County with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Pine
County. The same question arises again. Is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Pine
County comparable to Maple county in terms of its demographic landscape? If this does not happen to be the case, then the comparison
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seems
to take place between two
entirely
dis-similar counties. Perhaps, the spending power of the citizens of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Pine
County is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
large that it has led to an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
house
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
. Another possible reason could be the inefficiency of the council at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Pine
County to regulate the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
in housing sector that has
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lead
to such a marked
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in the housing prices.

Lastly
, the council of Maple County predicts that if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
measure
is passed
, it will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lead
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
house
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
in Maple County. This prediction sits upon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidences
that could prove to
be unwarranted
and dubious and the questions raised above could well be an indication that the prediction of the council lies upon premises that have not
been verified
.

In sum, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidences
provided by both the factions
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seem
to be completely baseless. They
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seem
to lend no support to the argument that are
being made
.
Therefore
, it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seems
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
to predict whether the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proposed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
measure
by the council would
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lead
to an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
house
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
in Maple County or no.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
488 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the