It is true that over the last decade air has become dirtier and It is commonly asserted that the only government must tackle this issue air pollution. I personally believe that there is no strong evidence to justify this view.
First and most obviously, all over the world increasing the number of cars and low-cost airlines has contributed to the air environment. One of the big reasons for pollution is car’s engines and fridges that can have bad far-reaching consequences for the population. If the government is not found the solution for this problem, air can become dirtier and the population can suffer from this. For example, if the government decreasing prohibit produce manufacturing can solve this problem.
Additionally, use chemicals in agriculture such as pesticides and insecticides also using chemical products cause indoor air pollution. If the government do not let farmers use harmful chemical pesticides, can observe dramatic changes and maintain our fresh air. for example, finding new beneficial products instead of chemical products and insist people use these products also can indicate that we are conserving our valuable air.
To conclude, whilst if the government to claim all people not to use harmful products for air pollution and finds new ways and products, problems with air pollution may decrease. I absolutely agree that the only government can solve air pollution.
It is true that over the last decade
air
has become dirtier and It is
commonly
asserted that the
only
government
must
tackle this issue
air
pollution
. I
personally
believe that there is no strong evidence to justify this view.
First
and most
obviously
, all over the world increasing the number of cars and low-cost airlines has contributed to the
air
environment. One of the
big
reasons for
pollution
is car’s engines and fridges that can have
bad
far-reaching consequences for the population. If the
government
is not found the solution for this problem,
air
can become dirtier and the population can suffer from this.
For example
, if the
government
decreasing prohibit produce manufacturing can solve this problem.
Additionally
,
use
chemicals
in agriculture such as pesticides and insecticides
also
using
chemical
products
cause indoor
air
pollution
. If the
government
do not
let
farmers
use
harmful
chemical
pesticides, can observe dramatic
changes
and maintain our fresh
air
.
for
example, finding new beneficial
products
instead
of
chemical
products
and insist
people
use
these
products
also
can indicate that we are conserving our valuable air.
To conclude
, whilst if the
government
to claim all
people
not to
use
harmful
products
for
air
pollution
and finds new ways and
products
, problems with
air
pollution
may decrease. I
absolutely
agree
that the
only
government
can solve
air
pollution
.