Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some think that heavy-handed governmental taxation is the only way to compel healthier eating. In my opinion, while this makes rational sense, its actual effectiveness is questionable.

Some think that heavy-handed governmental taxation is the only way to compel healthier eating. In my opinion, while this makes rational sense, its actual effectiveness is questionable. Those that argue in favour of these taxes can point to a logical chain of suppositions. Though taxes on unhealthy foods are rare, there is the occasional mandated price hike for sugary drinks and fast food, smoking is an instructive corollary. Several decades after research showed that smoking causes cancer, governments were able to push through legislation to tax cigarettes heavily. The result was that those already addicted to smoking continued to smoke but many people did not pick up the habit to begin with. Proponents argue this would also be the case when it comes to foods known to cause cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer. Many would eat them despite higher prices but the next generation would become more health conscious and that would further trickle down to their children. Though the above argument is well reasoned, people will still buy luxuries. There is strong evidence for this dating back centuries. After the war of independence from Britain, the newly formed United States instituted direly needed taxes on luxuries including whiskey and chocolate. The purpose of the taxes was to raise money, not to lower consumption of those products. The unpopular acts were internally vindicated when people continued to buy luxuries along the same growth trend, enabling them to increase the national budget. Even though cutting down on purely pleasurable products makes disinterested sense, people are more swayed by instant gratification than cold calculation. In conclusion, taxes on unhealthy foods would not be an effective measure against their consumption. Instead, governments should invest more in healthy school lunches and making healthy products more widely available to attack the problem at its root source

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that heavy-handed governmental taxation is the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 way to compel healthier eating. In my opinion, while this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 rational sense, its actual effectiveness is questionable.

Those that argue in Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 of these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutylevyfinepriceratecost
taxes
 can point to a logical chain of suppositions. Though You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutylevyfinepriceratecost
taxes
 on unhealthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
foods
 are rare, there is the Make sure that the adjective 'occasional' is correct. Possibly, it should be an adverb (typically ~ly) that modifies 'mandated'. Possibly, it should be the first word in a compound adjective (hyphenated adjective). Possibly, it is correct.
occasional mandated
 price hike for sugary drinks and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:quickrapidswiftprompt
fast
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
, smoking is an instructive corollary. Several decades after research This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 that smoking causes cancer, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 were able to push through legislation to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutylevyfinepriceratecost
tax
 cigarettes heavily
. The result was that those already addicted to smoking continued to smoke This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 did not pick up the habit to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with. Proponents argue this would also
 be the case when it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
foods
 known to cause cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
Many
 would eat them despite higher prices This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the next
 generation would become more health conscious and that would further
 trickle down to their children.

Though the above argument is well reasoned, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 will still
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 luxuries. There is strong evidence for this dating back centuries. After the war of independence from Britain, the newly
 formed United States instituted direly
 needed You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutylevyfinepriceratecost
taxes
 on luxuries including whiskey and chocolate. The purpose of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutylevyfinepriceratecost
taxes
 was to raise money, not to lower consumption of those products. The unpopular acts were internally
 vindicated when You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 continued to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 luxuries along the same growth trend, enabling them to increase the national budget. Even though
 cutting down on purely
 pleasurable products This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 disinterested sense, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are more swayed by instant gratification than This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :chillyfrosty
cold
 calculation.

In conclusion
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutylevyfinepriceratecost
taxes
 on unhealthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
foods
 would not be an effective measure against their consumption. Instead
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 should invest more in healthy school lunches and making healthy products more widely
 available to attack the problem at its root source