Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect. gEY1
It is frequently argued by certain people that today’s edge-cutting gadgets and technical advancements are expanding social inequality, while others considered that this trend has a positive influence. On the one hand, the one conclusive premise beyond this social gap being extensive is that in the competitive business world, the escalating cost of technical products varies from each other by brands and some features. Given this view, members of society with different eco-social backgrounds have been pursued to purchasing up-to-date techniques such as mobile phones of Apple and Samsung. The irrefutable evidence that the majority of people embrace brand technologies irrespective of their primary motives. Although some popular digital companies namely HP, LG, Sony have promotions among their customers, possession of them no longer means that the more brand products have belonged, the more such owners should be valued in the society. Hence, it can be deduced that a key role in the public is not played by materialism. On the other hand, the main driving force being opposite impact is that the breakthrough of technology is widely available in the most worldwide parts. This approach, for instance, has been supported by recent research, which has revealed that each mobile phone serves the same audio communication. It can be compelling bedrock to balance the financial status of people. If humans desire to buy devices nowadays, there is no need to book them from another market of countries. This recognizes not only social equality between the poor and rich but also between countries. After analyzing these facts, the satisfying effects are clear. In conclusion, as has been observed above, it is obvious that adverse impacts pose inequality among people’s economical condition. Likewise, I also affirm that some range of technical equipment grows unbridgeable gap in society.
It is
frequently
argued by certain
people
that
today
’s edge-cutting gadgets and technical advancements are expanding social inequality, while others considered that this trend has a
positive
influence.

On the one hand, the one conclusive premise beyond this social gap being extensive is that in the competitive business world, the escalating cost of technical products varies from each other by brands and
some
features.
Given
this view, members of society with
different
eco-social
backgrounds have
been pursued
to purchasing up-to-date techniques such as mobile phones of Apple and Samsung. The irrefutable evidence that the majority of
people
embrace brand technologies irrespective of their primary motives. Although
some
popular digital
companies
namely
HP, LG, Sony have promotions among their customers, possession of them no longer means that the more brand products have belonged, the more such owners should
be valued
in the society.
Hence
, it can
be deduced
that a key role in the public is not played by materialism.

On the other hand
, the main driving force being opposite impact is that the breakthrough of technology is
widely
available in the most worldwide parts. This approach,
for instance
, has
been supported
by recent research, which has revealed that each mobile phone serves the same audio communication. It can be compelling bedrock to balance the financial status of
people
. If humans desire to
buy
devices nowadays, there is no need to book them from another market of countries. This recognizes not
only
social equality between the poor and rich
but
also
between countries. After analyzing these facts, the satisfying effects are
clear
.

In conclusion
, as has
been observed
above, it is obvious that adverse impacts pose inequality among
people’s
economical condition.
Likewise
, I
also
affirm that
some
range of technical equipment grows unbridgeable gap in society.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
295 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts