Art is a form of human creativity. However, some citizens believe that national spending on the arts is unnecessary and the budget for it should be allocated for other sectors. This essay will explain why I believe it is not true and deliver some supporting facts and opinions related to it.
First, focusing on the arts is not wasting money. A unique form of arts in a country attracts tourists, which means it can increase the national income. It has also become an identity for a nation, for instance, Chiang May with its temples and Bali with its traditional dancing. Second, spending the money elsewhere does not mean that the ministry should ignore art, as long as there is a balance allocation for other segments, namely, education, sports, infrastructure, or anything else. I am certain that if a country only focus on one sector and ignore the others, it cannot become a well-developed nation. Although developing creative sectors is not as urgent as maintaining the infrastructure, its existence is necessary to enhance the level of tourist awareness to visit that place. It means, the government’s spending on art is a form of investment for supporting some potential places that not only be able to increase national revenue, but also allow people around to make a living from its impact in that district.
To sum up, although some people think that money allocated for the creative development in a country is unimportant, in contrary, I personally believe that it is wrong in some cases. Making a proper spending between arts and other sectors is important.
Art
is a form of human creativity.
However
,
some
citizens believe that national
spending
on the
arts
is unnecessary and the budget for it should
be allocated
for
other
sectors
. This essay will
explain
why I believe it is not true and deliver
some
supporting facts and opinions related to it.
First
, focusing on the
arts
is not wasting money. A unique form of
arts
in a country attracts tourists, which means it can increase the national income. It has
also
become an identity for a nation,
for instance
, Chiang May with its temples and Bali with its traditional dancing. Second,
spending
the money elsewhere does not mean that the ministry should
ignore
art
, as long as there is a balance allocation for
other
segments,
namely
, education, sports, infrastructure, or anything else. I am certain that if a country
only
focus on one
sector
and
ignore
the others, it cannot become a well-developed nation. Although developing creative
sectors
is not as urgent as maintaining the infrastructure, its existence is necessary to enhance the level of tourist awareness to visit that place. It means, the
government
’s
spending
on
art
is a form of investment for supporting
some
potential places that not
only
be able to increase national revenue,
but
also
allow
people
around to
make
a living from its impact in that district.
To sum up, although
some
people
think
that money allocated for the creative development in a country is unimportant, in contrary, I
personally
believe that it is
wrong
in
some
cases. Making a proper
spending
between
arts
and
other
sectors
is
important
.