The loss of natural habitats, in part due to intensive agriculture and industrial-scale mining in some parts of the world, as well as urbanisation, has put the survival of many species of plants and animals under threat. While this is certainly a major concern, is this the most pressing environmental problem that we should deal with?
I certainly feel that humanity has a moral obligation to safeguard the survival of different species of fauna and flora. The loss of any species is permanent and means that future generations will not be able to appreciate the wonders of a diverse natural world. For example, the tragic extinction of the dodo is something which we still lament even today.
Moreover, it can affect us detrimentally too. Many herbal remedies are derived from plants, and so the destruction of rainforests could easily have a negative effect on the production of medicinal drugs. In addition, we are part of a natural food chain, so the loss of animals, such as fish, means we will have less food in the future.
Ultimately though, there is a far wider problem that needs to be addressed: global warming. As a result of emissions of greenhouse gases, such as CO2 and methane, global temperatures are rising and we risk seeing runaway heating. This will lead to a number of problems, including flooding, extreme weather and drought, but also the extinction of species. Indeed, polar bears are already struggling to survive because of the loss of polar ice caps due to rising temperatures.
In other words, working to safeguard the survival of the natural world without tackling global warming would be entirely ineffective, so it’s not really a case of which one is more important: all environmental issues are ultimately interconnected, and so we need to take a holistic approach to the issue.
The
loss
of
natural
habitats, in part due to intensive agriculture and industrial-scale mining in
some
parts of the world,
as well
as
urbanisation
, has put the survival of
many
species of plants and animals under threat. While this is
certainly
a major concern, is this the most pressing environmental problem that we should deal with?
I
certainly
feel that humanity has a moral obligation to safeguard the survival of
different
species of fauna and flora. The
loss
of any species is permanent and means that future generations will not be able to appreciate the wonders of a diverse
natural
world.
For example
, the tragic extinction of the dodo is something which we
still
lament even
today
.
Moreover
, it can affect us
detrimentally
too.
Many
herbal remedies
are derived
from plants, and
so
the destruction of rainforests could
easily
have a
negative
effect on the production of medicinal drugs.
In addition
, we are part of a
natural
food chain,
so
the
loss
of animals, such as fish, means we will have less food in the future.
Ultimately
though, there is a far wider problem that needs to
be addressed
: global warming.
As a result
of emissions of greenhouse gases, such as CO2 and methane, global temperatures are
rising and
we
risk
seeing runaway heating. This will lead to a number of problems, including flooding, extreme weather and drought,
but
also
the extinction of species.
Indeed
, polar bears are already struggling to survive
because
of the
loss
of polar ice caps due to rising temperatures.
In other words
, working to safeguard the survival of the
natural
world without tackling global warming would be
entirely
ineffective,
so
it’s not
really
a case of which one is more
important
: all environmental issues are
ultimately
interconnected, and
so
we need to take a holistic approach to the issue.