Some feel that all young people should attend university, while others point out this may not be a suitable path for everyone. I am of the latter view. I believe that career training in other areas may serve the interests of many young people far better than undergraduate studies.
On the one hand, there is convincing support for university education for all. Firstly, a liberal education encourages the broadening of the mind. For example, students of history, art and literature tend to be tolerant and thoughtful and fulfil useful service careers in teaching, journalism, public relations and politics. Encouraging everyone to enrol in university would also push people towards lucrative professional roles, such as those held by doctors and lawyers, positions that also bring great social prestige.
However, despite these benefits, universal tertiary education would be problematic at both the societal and personal levels. It should be noted that the building of houses and offices, the transporting of goods, and the production of furniture and appliances are essential to society and require skilled manual workers and tradespeople. Further, many young men and women naturally excel when working with their hands. Forcing them to study disciplines of abstract thought would clearly be a waste of their time and potential. Thus, encouraging people to choose a path that allows them to invest in their natural strengths is better for both the individual and society as a whole.
Overall, it can be seen that although pursuing a university education has many merits, it may be more of a hindrance than a help to some people. In my own case, being very bad with my hands but quite handy with words, university was the right option for me. As this essay has shown, everyone is different and no one course in life fits all.
Some
feel that all young
people
should attend
university
, while others point out this may not be a suitable path for everyone. I am of the latter view. I believe that career training in other areas may serve the interests of
many
young
people
far better than undergraduate studies.
On the one hand, there is convincing support for
university
education
for all.
Firstly
, a liberal
education
encourages the broadening of the mind.
For example
, students of history, art and literature tend to be tolerant and thoughtful and fulfil useful service careers in teaching, journalism, public relations and politics. Encouraging everyone to enrol in
university
would
also
push
people
towards lucrative professional roles, such as those held by doctors and lawyers, positions that
also
bring great social prestige.
However
, despite these benefits, universal tertiary
education
would be problematic at both the societal and personal levels. It should
be noted
that the building of
houses
and offices, the transporting of
goods
, and the production of furniture and appliances are essential to society and require skilled manual workers and tradespeople.
Further
,
many
young
men
and women
naturally
excel when working with their hands. Forcing them to study disciplines of abstract
thought
would
clearly
be a waste of their time and potential.
Thus
, encouraging
people
to choose a path that
allows
them to invest in their natural strengths is better for both the individual and society as a whole.
Overall
, it can be
seen
that although pursuing a
university
education
has
many
merits, it may be more of a hindrance than a
help
to
some
people
. In my
own
case, being
very
bad
with my hands
but
quite handy with words,
university
was the right option for me. As this essay has shown, everyone is
different
and no one course in life fits all.