Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

People have various views about law enforcement upon the reusing spoiled things produce in domestic by government as opposed to without any legal action. Obviously, nevertheless, some people are conscious about to recycle their degraded things made in their houses, but a group of people do not do the practice. Moreover, if law and order is such that, everyone have to recycle them by reuse them in various purposes, which will be more fruitfull. For example, rotten things can be used as fertilizer in their garden, by storing metal things can be supplied to recycling mills to melt them and produce new cans and other appliences. However, law is not the main solution to stop a problem. Furthermore, some people always disobey laws. Hence, government should take necessary initiative to boost consciousness amoung the society. As a number people are ignorant, they are not be abled to learn these good things from their institution. For this reason, beside the government, many non- government organizations have to come to the countrymen to discuss this burning question. While there are some benefits to swell the education in the people to recycle their waste products, but applying strong royal decree might be more effective in this field. In conclusion, I believe, government should emphasise on legal action instead of rising moral feelings.

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
People
 have various views about You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcasestatuterequirementcodeconstitutioncharter
law
 enforcement upon the reusing spoiled things produce in domestic by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 as opposed to without any legal action.

Obviously
, nevertheless
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are conscious about to recycle their degraded things made in their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residences
houses
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 a group of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 do not do the practice. Moreover
, if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcasestatuterequirementcodeconstitutioncharter
law
 and order is such that, everyone The pronoun ‘everyone’ is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: “has”, “had”.hashad
have
 to recycle them by reuse them in various purposes, which will be more Possible spelling mistake found.fruitfulfruitfully
fruitfull
. For example
, rotten things can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 as fertilizer in their garden, by storing metal things can be supplied
 to recycling mills to melt them and produce new cans and other Possible spelling mistake found.appliances
appliences
.

However
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcasestatuterequirementcodeconstitutioncharter
law
 is not the main solution to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 a problem. Furthermore
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 always disobey You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcasestatuterequirementcodeconstitutioncharter
laws
. Hence
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 should take necessary initiative to boost consciousness Possible spelling mistake found.amongamount
amoung
 the society. As a Did you mean “number of”?number of
number
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are ignorant, they are not be Possible spelling mistake found.ablefabledgabledtabledbledcabled
abled
 to learn these This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 things from their institution. For this reason
, beside the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 non- You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 organizations This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approacharrive
come
 to the countrymen to discuss this burning question.

While there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 benefits to swell the education in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to recycle their waste products, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 applying strong royal decree might be more effective in this field.

In conclusion
, I believe, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 should Possible spelling mistake. ‘emphasise’ is British English.emphasize
emphasise
 on legal action instead
 of rising moral feelings. 