Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that research of medicines should be directly based on human trial. Is this the right way give your opinion and discuss its advantages and disadvantages.

Some people believe that research of medicines should be directly based on human trial. Is this the right way give your opinion and discuss its advantages and disadvantages. 3ale5
Generally, medicine trials are performed on animals or by computer-based examination before applying on individuals, except those which are a non-serious impact on human beings. While a certain group of people are in favour of all new trials should straightly apply to the end-users suffering from the disease, whereas, it has some pros and cons. However, I am fully disagreeing with the viewpoint of the direct test on human life. Trials can give both results whether successful or unsuccessful, and it would be very critical to release medicine in an open market without getting the authentic output. If experts would directly test medicines on human life, they put the life at risk by ignoring its further symptoms. Apart from this, it would be more difficult to procure the side-effects, as at that time they would be unaware that, how dangerous it will? For example, during the covid-19 pandemic, in some countries trials are applied on infected persons and it was lead to result in death for some cases. Therefore, human trials have a lot of ill-effects and a great loss to the precious life of individuals. On the other hand, sometimes the patient is in critical conditions with unidentified viruses, at that time to save that life immediate trials are applied on them, which would result in both sides positive or negative. As, nobody in the medical field intentionally put the life at risks, unless such a situation arises and also pressure to save the life of other public. In addition to this, they are also unaware of what kind of the disease, whether it is communicable or not. For example, in Wuhan, which is the epic centre of covid-19, they are unable to control the worse situation as it was transferring one to another. Hence, in such kind of situation, it is beneficial to directly trial to take chance to save that person and millions of others. In conclusion, even though there are many drawbacks of human trials which lead to serious outcomes, however, in particular, situation benefits can also not to be ignored.
Generally
, medicine
trials
are performed
on animals or by computer-based examination
before
applying on individuals, except those which are a non-serious impact on
human
beings. While a certain group of
people
are in
favour
of all new
trials
should
straightly
apply to the
end
-users suffering from the disease, whereas, it has
some
pros and cons.
However
, I am
fully
disagreeing with the viewpoint of the direct
test
on
human
life.

Trials can give both results whether successful or unsuccessful, and it would be
very
critical to release medicine in an open market without getting the authentic output. If experts would
directly
test
medicines on
human
life
, they put the
life
at
risk
by ignoring its
further
symptoms. Apart from this, it would be more difficult to procure the
side-effects
, as at that time they would be unaware that, how
dangerous
it will?
For example
, during the
covid-19
pandemic, in
some
countries
trials
are applied
on infected persons and it was lead to result in death for
some
cases.
Therefore
,
human
trials
have
a lot of
ill-effects and a great loss to the precious
life
of individuals.

On the other hand
,
sometimes
the patient is in critical conditions with unidentified viruses, at that time to save that
life
immediate
trials
are applied
on them, which would result in both sides
positive
or
negative
. As, nobody in the medical field
intentionally
put the
life
at
risks
, unless such a
situation
arises and
also
pressure to save the
life
of other public.
In addition
to this, they are
also
unaware of what kind of the disease, whether it is communicable or not.
For example
, in Wuhan, which is the epic
centre
of
covid-19
, they are unable to control the worse
situation
as it was transferring one to another.
Hence
, in such kind of
situation
, it is beneficial to
directly
trial
to take chance to save that person and millions of others.

In conclusion
,
even though
there are
many
drawbacks of
human
trials
which lead to serious outcomes,
however
,
in particular
,
situation
benefits can
also
not to be
ignored
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that research of medicines should be directly based on human trial. Is this the right way give your opinion and discuss its advantages and disadvantages.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
345 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts