A number of scholars advocate lengthening high-school education to four years; therefore, the pupils could live up to all expectations of them. Others, however, claim the contrary, stating that institution attendees would go off the idea and, ultimately, attendance would fall. From my perspective, I support the latter, voicing disapproval of the former in that I believe extending high school education has several major drawbacks far outweighing its advantages.
In the first place, it is undeniable that lectures and curriculum programs are specially designed to finely fit into three years of high school. Hence, extending school time would leave pupils an abundant amount of time which could otherwise be used for further study options namely colleges and universities. In such cases, lengthy institution attendance hours may well arouse undergraduates' boredom and tediousness; consequently, this would lead to accelerating school dropout rates.
What is more, it is this idea that brings about some unexpected upheavals which have to be overcome before being applied to reality. For instance, one major problem would be the insufficiency of teachers and lecturers. Furthermore, students and parents might as well find it troublesome to adjust to a whole different educational system without any very rational reasons.
Nevertheless, to a certain extent, the aforementioned proposal has several advantages that could be taken into consideration. Take, for example, one noteworthy benefit of high school education extension is that it probably puts less strain on pupils, thus allowing them to embrace the opportunities to attend more extra-curricular activities. This is somewhat more beneficial for their multidimensional self-development than devoting most of their time to studying.
All things considered, while the suggestion of lengthening high-school learning could destress students and exert less pressure on them, the idea would do more harm than good as it would result in plenty of conundrums. Thereby, I hold a firm belief that we ought to carry on with our current educational system and only make changes if need be.
A number of scholars advocate lengthening high-school education to four years;
therefore
, the pupils could
live
up to all expectations of them. Others,
however
, claim the contrary, stating that institution attendees would go off the
idea
and,
ultimately
, attendance would fall. From my perspective, I support the latter, voicing disapproval of the former in that I believe extending high
school
education has several major drawbacks far outweighing its advantages.
In the
first
place, it is undeniable that lectures and curriculum programs are
specially
designed to
finely
fit into three years of high
school
.
Hence
, extending
school
time would
leave
pupils an abundant amount of time which could
otherwise
be
used
for
further
study options
namely
colleges and universities. In such cases, lengthy institution attendance hours may well arouse undergraduates' boredom and tediousness;
consequently
, this would lead to accelerating
school
dropout rates.
What is more
, it is this
idea
that brings about
some
unexpected upheavals which
have to
be overcome
before
being applied
to reality.
For instance
, one major problem would be the insufficiency of teachers and lecturers.
Furthermore
, students and parents might
as well
find it troublesome to adjust to a whole
different
educational system without any
very
rational reasons.
Nevertheless
, to a certain extent, the aforementioned proposal has several advantages that could
be taken
into consideration. Take,
for example
, one noteworthy benefit of high
school
education extension is that it
probably
puts less strain on pupils,
thus
allowing them to embrace the opportunities to attend more extra-curricular activities. This is somewhat more beneficial for their multidimensional self-development than devoting most of their time to studying.
All things considered, while the suggestion of lengthening high-school learning could
destress
students and exert less pressure on them, the
idea
would do more harm than
good
as it would result in
plenty
of conundrums. Thereby, I hold a firm belief that we ought to carry on with our
current
educational system and
only
make
changes
if need be.