Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Smoking tobacco like other dangerous drugs should be made illegal. Agree or disagree?

Smoking tobacco like other dangerous drugs should be made illegal. Agree or disagree? r1Ba2

In recent years, smoking has indeed become a major source of concern. I believe that tobacco products should be forbidden from being consumed. On the one hand, all kinds of tobacco consumption must be prohibited due to the negative effects on individual and societal health. To begin with, those who smoke frequently may be at an elevated risk of developing several potentially fatal conditions. Without a doubt, studies have shown that various chemical components in cigarettes, like nicotine, are the primary cause of lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and a variety of other respiratory disorders, resulting in over six million deaths each year around the world. Second, smoking cigarettes endangers the lives of nonsmokers who are frequently exposed to tobacco smoke in the environment, such as at work or home. For example, an estimated 3, 000 Vietnamese die of lung cancer each year, and over 300 infants develop respiratory tract infections as a result of inhaling secondhand cigarette smoke from other smokers. On the other hand, I believe that smoking restriction has many major advantages. The main advantage is that it may not only assist people in living healthier lives but may also assist the government in alleviating the burden of medical care. Indeed, healthcare costs consume a significant portion of the government's budget; therefore, if fewer individuals smoke, less money would be spent on smoking-related ailments, leaving more funding for other patients. Another advantage is that smoking bans may help to reduce pollutant levels in the air. Supporters of this viewpoint argue that states and localities that have implemented non-smoking rules in restaurants and public indoor areas have superior indoor air quality than those that continue to allow smoking in public. To sum up, I believe the government should take proactive measures to prohibit the use of cigarettes because they have bad health consequences, and society benefits much from this policy.

In recent years, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 has indeed
 become a major source of concern. I believe that tobacco products should be forbidden
 from being consumed
.

On the one hand, all kinds of tobacco consumption This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
be prohibited
 due to the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 effects on individual and societal health. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, those who You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
frequently
 may be at an elevated This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
 of developing several potentially
 fatal conditions. Without a doubt, studies have shown that various chemical components in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsmoke
cigarettes
, like nicotine, are the primary cause of lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and a variety of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 respiratory disorders, resulting in over six million deaths each year around the world. Second, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsmoke
cigarettes
 endangers the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 of nonsmokers who are frequently
 exposed to tobacco You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
 in the environment, such as at work or home. For example
, an estimated 3, 000 Vietnamese This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :pass away
die
 of lung cancer each year, and over 300 infants develop respiratory tract infections as a result
 of inhaling secondhand You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsmoke
cigarette
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
 from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 smokers.

On the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hand, I believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 restriction has This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 major advantages. The main advantage is that it may not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 assist This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in living healthier This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 may also
 assist the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 in alleviating the burden of medical care. Indeed
, healthcare costs consume a significant portion of the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
's budget; therefore
, if fewer individuals You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
, less money would be spent
 on smoking-related ailments, leaving more funding for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 patients. Another advantage is that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 bans may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 pollutant levels in the air. Supporters of this viewpoint argue that states and localities that have implemented non-smoking This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 in restaurants and public indoor areas have superior indoor air Use "(quality)" to make a comparison with this adjective.(quality)
quality
 than those that continue to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
allow
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 in public.

To sum up, I believe the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 should take proactive measures to prohibit the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsmoke
cigarettes
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 they have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evil
bad
 health consequences, and society benefits much from this policy. 