Both reading and speaking discuss about the fossils that collectors have been selling. The reading claims that this action is not fair and the scientists and general people don’t have access to some certain fossils. However, the listening says that these claims is not true and they are exaggerating this action.
Firstly, the reading passage states that due the fact that some fossilsare maintained in private houses, public people are not able to see them and they are suffering from it. In contrast, the professor rejects this point by saying that a lot of fossils are existence in museums for the people and saying this claim is far away from fairness. also she says that there are a lot of fossils in the schools for student and in other places to public people.
Secondly, the reading passage states that because of lack of access to some fossils the scientists are not able to carry out their research on the fossils. On the other hand, the professor alters that this assertion is not a realistic one. she says that most of the scientist can get access to to the fossils and they are doing their research on them.
finally, the reading says that the private collectors destroy some of the signs on the fossils and so the scientists no longer discover useful information from them and also in some case they deform the way the fossils were put in the ground or under the ground. In contrast, the professor says the scientists without paying attention to them are able to discover other fossils in the other region because according to professor's claim there are a lot of regains where no privet collectors go. also she says with being changed of place, the scientist can discover the needed information.
Both
reading
and speaking
discuss about the
fossils
that collectors have been selling. The
reading
claims
that this action is not
fair
and the
scientists
and general
people
don’t have access to
some
certain
fossils
.
However
, the listening
says
that these
claims
is not
true and
they are exaggerating this action.
Firstly
, the
reading
passage states that due the fact that
some
fossilsare
maintained in private
houses
, public
people
are not able to
see
them and
they are suffering from it.
In contrast
, the professor rejects this point by saying that
a lot of
fossils
are existence in museums for the
people
and saying this
claim
is far away from fairness.
also
she
says
that there are
a lot of
fossils
in the schools for student and in
other
places to public
people
.
Secondly
, the
reading
passage states that
because
of lack of access to
some
fossils
the
scientists
are not able to carry out their research on the
fossils
. On the
other
hand, the professor alters that this assertion is not a realistic one.
she
says
that most of the
scientist
can
get
access
to to
the
fossils and
they are doing their research on them.
finally
, the
reading
says
that the private collectors
destroy
some of the
signs on the
fossils
and
so
the
scientists
no longer discover useful information from them and
also
in
some
case they deform the way the
fossils
were put
in the ground or under the ground.
In contrast
, the professor
says
the
scientists
without paying attention to them are able to discover
other
fossils
in the
other
region
because
according to professor's
claim
there are
a lot of
regains where no privet collectors go.
also
she
says
with being
changed
of place, the
scientist
can discover the needed information.