Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed-in tariff. Under such a policy, investors on any scale, from large corporations to individual homeowners, produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their property. Elec

One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed-in tariff. Under such a policy, investors on any scale, from large corporations to individual homeowners, produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their property. Elec Nr3qq

Although the argument sounds as the great solution to address the increasing demand of the energy. While analyzing the statement profoundly lack of evidence and the groundless assumption qualify the validation. First of all, author assumes that there is no author means of promoting renewable energy program except the feed-in tarif policy. Perhaps there might be other policy, which is more sustainable and cost effective. Similarly, he assumes, the feed in tariff policy is not yet implemented and would be successful in near future. It may be true that there have been already this kind of practice and large scale producer and individual homeowner might not be interested because of its limitations. Large number of storage batteries, huge cost and several other drawbacks might frustating and cannot run in long term and the business firm would not get enough profit from such policy. The assumption would be reliable if background information and other succes story is presented. Furthermore, he assumes that to promote the renewable enrgy one should be concerns just in solar energy. In many case, solar energy required large number of space for storage battery –if is harmful too, and receiving panel. But there would be many alternatives other than solar energy, hydropower, for example, have less environmental impact andgreater efficiency in terms of both energy and cost other than the solar energy. There would be the no possibility of other renewable energy–wind, thermal, hydropower tidal—and the expected location might be the desert, but he have to clearly mentions the background information and supporting premise to strenthen his argument. Finally he concede the research outcomes reluctantly, the research might be other place where the solar energy is most feasible or the researh might be carried out in special circumtance. Without mentioning the relible cost, effectiveness and suitable example the feed-in tariff policy is questionable. So in conclusion, althouhg the author concern in promoting the rnewable enrgy is appreciable, one could not convinced just these superficial assumption, more detail evidence shoud be submit for the reliability of ate proposal.

Although the argument sounds as the great solution to address the increasing demand of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. While analyzing the statement profoundly
 lack of evidence and the groundless assumption qualify the validation.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, author assumes that there is no author means of promoting renewable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 program except the feed-in Possible spelling mistake found.tariffTarimtar ifArifTariq
tarif
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcodemanagementprotocoltheoryarrangementscheme
policy
. Perhaps there You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 be You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcodemanagementprotocoltheoryarrangementscheme
policy
, which is more sustainable and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withworthoutlayfigureprice tagpricerate
cost
 effective.

Similarly
, he assumes, the feed in tariff You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcodemanagementprotocoltheoryarrangementscheme
policy
 is not yet
 implemented and would be successful in near future. It may be true that there have been already this kind of practice and large scale producer and individual homeowner You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 not be interested
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of its limitations. Large number of storage batteries, huge You use this word too often, consider replacing it withworthoutlayfigureprice tagpricerate
cost
 and several You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 drawbacks You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
Possible spelling mistake found.frustrating
frustating
 and cannot run in long term and the business firm would not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
 profit from such You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcodemanagementprotocoltheoryarrangementscheme
policy
. The assumption would be reliable if background information and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
Possible spelling mistake found.success
succes
 story is presented
.

Furthermore
, he assumes that to promote the renewable Possible spelling mistake found.energy
enrgy
 one should be concerns This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcosmic
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. In Possible agreement error. The noun case seems to be countable; consider using: "many cases".many cases
many case
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcosmic
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 required large number of space for storage battery –if is harmful too, and receiving panel. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 there would be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 alternatives You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcosmic
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, hydropower, for example
, have less environmental impact Possible spelling mistake found.and greater
andgreater
 efficiency in terms of both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withworthoutlayfigureprice tagpricerate
cost
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 than the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcosmic
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. There would be the no possibility of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 renewable energy–wind, thermal, hydropower tidal—and the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipated
expected
 location You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 be the desert, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 he The pronoun 'he' is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: "has", "had".hashad
have
 to clearly
 mentions the background information and supporting premise to Possible spelling mistake found.strengthen
strenthen
 his argument.

Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Finally,
Finally
 he The pronoun 'he' is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: "concedes", "conceded".concedesconceded
concede
 the research outcomes reluctantly
, the research You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 be You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 place where the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcosmic
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is most feasible or the Possible spelling mistake found.research
researh
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
be carried
 out in special Possible spelling mistake found.circumstance
circumtance
. Without mentioning the Possible spelling mistake found.reliable
relible
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withworthoutlayfigureprice tagpricerate
cost
, effectiveness and suitable example the feed-in tariff You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcodemanagementprotocoltheoryarrangementscheme
policy
 is questionable.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
in conclusion
, Possible spelling mistake found.although
althouhg
 the author concern in promoting the Possible spelling mistake found.renewable
rnewable
Possible spelling mistake found.energy
enrgy
 is appreciable, one could not The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: "convince"convince
convinced
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 these superficial assumption, more detail evidence Possible spelling mistake found.shouldshoutshroudSOUDshod
shoud
 be Consider using a past participle here: "submitted".submitted
submit
 for the reliability of ate proposal. 