Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or not?

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or not? ONad

Some people belive that atomic energy is best option to fulfil our raising need of energy on the contrary, I am not agree with this school of thought. According to my opinion we should use other resources of energy like renewable energy. In the first paragraph i would like to say that where there are many benefits of nuclear energy there are also a lot of disadvantage too. For example, It can create a massive explosion which can be cause of great distraction like recently happened in the lebnana, a massive blow out in the warehouse of nuclear weapons. Moreover, It's a very expensive method, difficult to afford for most countries. On the other hand, we have to use a systematic approach to handle these critical method which should be pragmatic approach. there are numerous ways to make energy by using natural ways such as solar energy, wind energy, water energy etc. Which is not only cheap but also environment friendly, will help us to overcome the global warming issue. At the end, I will conclude by saying that according to my thinking, fission energy is not a better solution. We should use alternative and sustainable approach to make energy.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
Possible spelling mistake found.believeBelizerelivebeliebe live
belive
 that atomic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
A determiner is probably missing here: "is the best".is the best
is best
 option to fulfil our raising need of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
on the contrary
, I am not Consider using a past participle here: "agreed".agreed
agree
 with this school of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
. According to my opinion we should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 other resources of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 like renewable energy.

In the first
 paragraph Did you mean "I"?I
i
 would like to say that where there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 benefits of nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 there are also
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
 disadvantage too. For example
, It can create a massive explosion which can Did you mean "because"?because
be cause
 of great distraction like recently happened in the Possible spelling mistake found.LeblancLeanna
lebnana
, a massive blow out in the warehouse of nuclear weapons.

Moreover
, It's a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 expensive method, difficult to afford for most countries.

On the other hand
, we This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 a systematic approach to handle these critical method which should be pragmatic approach. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterThere
there
 are numerous ways to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 by using natural ways such as solar You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, wind You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, water You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 etc. Which is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :economical
cheap
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 environment friendly, will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 us to overcome the global warming issue.

At the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
, I will conclude by saying that according to my thinking, fission You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is not a better solution. We should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 alternative and sustainable approach to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. 