Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security. d116
In recent times, most of the countries across the globe are using renewable sources of energy. People are divided in their opinion about whether the extensive use of such resources is better for the environment or is an unreliable resource due to its uncertain availability. In this essay, I will examine both these views and explain why it is best to use green energy. Natural source of energy is far better for the environment than the non-renewable energy source as former do not cause pollution and is not replenishable. For ages, especially during the industrial revolution, developed countries had been using fossil fuels as a major source of energy, leading to an increase in air pollution and global warming. Finally, countries have realized the damage the latter energy resources cause and thus, moved to the green revolution. Green energy such as solar, wind, and hydro energy not only is a cost-effective substitute but also causes no harm to our planet Earth. In a research, it was found that effects of global warming have reduced greatly in Texas, USA ever since solar energy has been used as the source of electricity in the area. Not only that, residents of the state are enjoying the reduced electricity bills too. Therefore, I believe that renewable energy resource is indeed better for the environment and is quite cost-effective. However, some may argue that renewable resources are not secure energy sources as they are not sustainable in the long run. Even though non-replenishable, these sources are dependent on various factors with no human-control to be able to be utilized to their maximum potentials. Tidal energy, for instance, relies upon high tidal waves to provide electricity, which could fluctuate depending upon the wave strength on a particular day. Nonetheless, this drawback can be catered by introducing a power plant with a great storage system so that the energy produced on a high tide day could be stored and consumed on a low tide day. Overall, the threat of energy unavailability caused by going green is not as serious as some portray. In conclusion, the natural resources are not only environment friendly but pocket friendly too. Moreover, the numerous advantages of green energy and high-tech power plants outweigh the unwarranted concern people have regarding energy security.
In recent times, most of the countries across the globe are using renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
are divided
in their opinion about whether the extensive
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of such resources is better for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
or is an unreliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resource
due to its uncertain availability. In this essay, I will examine both these views and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
why it is best to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
green
energy.

Natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is far better for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
than the non-renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
as former do not cause pollution and is not
Possible spelling mistake found.
replenishable
. For ages,
especially
during the industrial revolution,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developed countries
had been using fossil fuels as a major
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, leading to an increase in air pollution and global warming.
Finally
, countries have realized the damage the latter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
resources cause and
thus
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
moved
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
green
revolution.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Green
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
such as solar, wind, and hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
is a cost-effective substitute
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
causes no harm to our planet Earth. In a research, it
was found
that effects of global warming have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
greatly
in Texas, USA ever since solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
has been
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of electricity in the area. Not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
that, residents of the state are enjoying the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
electricity bills too.
Therefore
, I believe that renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resource
is
indeed
better for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
and is quite cost-effective.

However
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
may argue that renewable resources are not secure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
as they are not sustainable in the long run.
Even though
Possible spelling mistake found.
non-replenishable
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
are dependent on various factors with no human-control to be able to
be utilized
to their maximum potentials. Tidal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
,
for instance
, relies upon high tidal waves to provide electricity, which could fluctuate depending upon the wave strength on a particular day. Nonetheless, this drawback can
be catered
by introducing a power plant with a great storage system
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produced on a high tide day could
be stored
and consumed on a low tide day.
Overall
, the threat of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
unavailability caused by going
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
green
is not as serious as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
portray.

In conclusion
, the natural resources are not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
friendly
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
pocket friendly too.
Moreover
, the numerous advantages of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
green
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
and high-tech power plants outweigh the unwarranted concern
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
have regarding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
security.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
379 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts