It is often argued that superstars are earning much more revenue than political leaders. This essay will discuss the possible causes of this notion and explain why, in my opinion, this is a negative development.
There are two root causes why celebrities are making more money as compared to legislators. First and foremost reason is that these famous personalities have a significant number of ways to generate income, such as online streaming services. For example, singing a song in a YouTube video with some advertisements enables them to earn huge money. Another cogent reason for this is many of the popular superstars represent their country all around the world by performing it best in matches, such as cricket, football, and tennis, because of this they are well-known among individuals and receiving much more income than political leaders, who are just known among their own citizens.
However, I personally feel this development is relatively negative because of various factors. Firstly, government employees are also working hard to develop their country. To illustrate, working on various issues including employment, crimes, and so on. So, it is justifiable for them to earn the same as other celebrities. Secondly, if this trend is not changed, this may discourage legislators to perform well and even motivate them to commit crimes. For instance, money laundering. In addition, the enormous salary gap discourages people to choose a career as politicians. As a result, it is required to minimize this gap and both the sectors have equal earnings.
In conclusion, although, it is undeniable that popular personalities are doing a lot to generate more income than political leaders, I believed that this disparity is a negative development on a whole. In order to attract more youth to choose careers as politicians, so it is better to offer the same salaries as other high professionals.
It is
often
argued that superstars are earning much more revenue than political leaders. This essay will discuss the possible causes of this notion and
explain
why, in my opinion, this is a
negative
development.
There are two
root
causes why celebrities are making more money as compared to legislators.
First
and foremost reason is that these
famous
personalities have a significant number of ways to generate income, such as online streaming services.
For example
, singing a song in a YouTube video with
some
advertisements enables them to earn huge money. Another cogent reason for this is
many
of the popular superstars represent their country all around the world by performing it best in matches, such as cricket, football, and tennis,
because of this
they are well-known among individuals and receiving much more income than political leaders, who are
just
known among their
own
citizens.
However
, I
personally
feel this development is
relatively
negative
because
of various factors.
Firstly
,
government
employees are
also
working
hard
to develop their country. To illustrate, working on various issues including employment, crimes, and
so
on.
So
, it is justifiable for them to earn the same as other celebrities.
Secondly
, if this trend is not
changed
, this may discourage legislators to perform well and even motivate them to commit crimes.
For instance
, money laundering.
In addition
, the enormous salary gap discourages
people
to choose a career as politicians.
As a result
, it
is required
to minimize this gap and both the sectors have equal earnings.
In conclusion
, although, it is undeniable that popular personalities are doing a lot to generate more income than political leaders, I believed that this disparity is a
negative
development on a whole. In order to attract more youth to choose careers as politicians,
so
it is better to offer the same salaries as other high professionals.