Many researchers believe that they can define the children to see if they became the criminal based on genetic evidence. I strongly disagree with this notion. From my perspective genes have a effect on the behaviour of children, but the primary determination is intelligence of quotient and emotion which are shaped by person itself. This can be prevented with the help of an educated society.
Firstly, this ideology itself put a barrier for children's mind that the the selection process of their parents which is not depend on free will can destroy their life and it is impossible to run away from genetic traits. Secondly, if this arguement is right, then the adoption of child is pointless, because regardless of the child's upbringing, there is a high probability that child will be a criminal if child biological parents do the same. On the conrary, the real life example can be observed from Steve Jobs who known as revalutionary person in tech industry and adopted by his parents as an infant.
Many
researchers believe that they can define the children to
see
if they became the criminal based on genetic evidence. I
strongly
disagree with this notion. From my perspective genes have
a
effect on the
behaviour
of children,
but
the primary determination is intelligence of quotient and emotion which
are shaped
by person itself. This can be
prevented
with the
help
of an educated society.
Firstly
, this ideology itself put a barrier for children's mind that
the the
selection process of their parents which is not
depend
on free
will can
destroy
their life and it is impossible to run away from genetic traits.
Secondly
, if this
arguement
is right, then the adoption of child is pointless,
because
regardless of the child's upbringing, there is a high probability that child will be a criminal if child biological parents do the same. On the
conrary
, the real life example can
be observed
from Steve Jobs
who known
as
revalutionary
person in tech industry and adopted by his parents as an infant.