Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Many researchers believe that we can now study the behaviour of children to see if they will grow up to be criminals, while others disagree. To what extent do you think crime is determined by genetics? Is it possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals?

Many researchers believe that we can now study the behaviour of children to see if they will grow up to be criminals, while others disagree. Is it possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals? XQMw

Many researchers believe that they can define the children to see if they became the criminal based on genetic evidence. I strongly disagree with this notion. From my perspective genes have a effect on the behaviour of children, but the primary determination is intelligence of quotient and emotion which are shaped by person itself. This can be prevented with the help of an educated society. Firstly, this ideology itself put a barrier for children's mind that the the selection process of their parents which is not depend on free will can destroy their life and it is impossible to run away from genetic traits. Secondly, if this arguement is right, then the adoption of child is pointless, because regardless of the child's upbringing, there is a high probability that child will be a criminal if child biological parents do the same. On the conrary, the real life example can be observed from Steve Jobs who known as revalutionary person in tech industry and adopted by his parents as an infant.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
Many
 researchers believe that they can define the children to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 if they became the criminal based on genetic evidence. I strongly
 disagree with this notion. From my perspective genes have Use "an" instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'an
a
 effect on the Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.behavior
behaviour
 of children, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the primary determination is intelligence of quotient and emotion which are shaped
 by person itself. This can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :precluded
prevented
 with the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 of an educated society.

Firstly
, this ideology itself put a barrier for children's mind that Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only "the" or "the" is left.the
the the
 selection process of their parents which is not Consider using a past participle here: "depended".depended
depend
 on free Two modal verbs connected. Did you mean: "will, can", "will" or "can"?will, canwillcan
will can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishruin
destroy
 their life and it is impossible to run away from genetic traits. Secondly
, if this Possible spelling mistake found.argument
arguement
 is right, then the adoption of child is pointless, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 regardless of the child's upbringing, there is a high probability that child will be a criminal if child biological parents do the same. On the Possible spelling mistake found.contrary
conrary
, the real life example can be observed
 from Steve Jobs A noun should not follow 'who'. Try changing to a verb or maybe to "who is a known".who is a known
who known
 as Possible spelling mistake found.revolutionary
revalutionary
 person in tech industry and adopted by his parents as an infant. 