Undoubtedly, today's world is inclining towards globalisation at a fast pace which has led to setting up of one global style for work communication like English, to be specific. This has also given birth to the following notion of implementing a single dialect worldwide, which some people, including me, believe that it is not a satisfactory step. This essay will discuss the same in detail along with certain references in regards to the argument.
First and foremost, upon observing from an employment perspective, it can be comprehended that mandating a unique speech across the globe will certainly be easier for overseas traders to enhance their business offerings to the international clients thereby, surpassing the communication barrier as citing one's mother tongue sometimes, may hinder such dealings. In order to grab these opportunities, a few nations, tend to opt for a second style of speaking to incentivise their trade. For instance, a male-grooming kit brand can be restricted only to the nationwide distribution network if it fails to promote to a global scale whilst, it's competitors can grow up the ladder easily.
On the contrary, language indeed represents the essence of any region besides, it also unveils the originality of an area. Hence, folks entrust that it is significantly advantageous for their society to stand out from the herd, which in my opinion is extremely required. Albeit, the fact that a foreign linguistic is only limited to enterprise-related works without hampering their cultural norms. For example, India is well-known for Khadi clothing style, started by Mahatma Gandhi and it is still preserving the persona of the country's culture.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that though a plethora of financial tradings can be obtained, a national language must not only be preserved but promoted as well, so as to protect the individuality of a society. Furthermore, I firmly believe that making a common dialect may be a feasible solution for short-term growth however, in the long-run, it will certainly become monotonous. In order to sustain diversity and unity both, equilibrium needs to be maintained between the societies.
Undoubtedly
,
today
's world is inclining towards
globalisation
at a
fast
pace which has led to setting up of one global style for work communication like English, to be specific. This has
also
given
birth to the following notion of implementing a single dialect worldwide, which
some
people
, including me, believe that it is not a satisfactory step. This essay will discuss the same in detail along with certain references
in regards to
the argument.
First
and foremost, upon observing from an employment perspective, it can
be comprehended
that mandating a unique speech across the globe will
certainly
be easier for overseas traders to enhance their business offerings to the international clients thereby, surpassing the communication barrier as citing one's mother tongue
sometimes
, may hinder such dealings. In order to grab these opportunities, a few nations, tend to opt for a second style of speaking to
incentivise
their trade.
For instance
, a male-grooming kit brand can
be restricted
only
to the nationwide distribution network if it fails to promote to a global scale whilst, it's competitors can grow up the ladder
easily
.
On the contrary
, language
indeed
represents the essence of any region
besides
, it
also
unveils the originality of an area.
Hence
, folks entrust that it is
significantly
advantageous for their society to stand out from the herd, which in my opinion is
extremely
required. Albeit, the fact that a foreign linguistic is
only
limited to enterprise-related works without hampering their cultural norms.
For example
, India is well-known for
Khadi
clothing style,
started
by Mahatma Gandhi and it is
still
preserving the persona of the country's culture.
In conclusion
, I would like to emphasize that though a plethora of financial tradings can
be obtained
, a national language
must
not
only
be preserved
but
promoted
as well
,
so as to
protect the individuality of a society.
Furthermore
, I
firmly
believe that making a common dialect may be a feasible solution for short-term growth
however
, in the long-run, it will
certainly
become monotonous. In order to sustain diversity and unity both, equilibrium needs to
be maintained
between the societies.