Undoubtedly, today's world is inclining towards globalisation at a fast pace which has led to setting up of one global style for work communication like English, to be specific. This has also given birth to the following notion of implementing a single dialect worldwide, which some people, including me, believe that it is not a satisfactory step. This essay will discuss the same in detail along with certain references in regards to the argument.
First and foremost, upon observing from an employment perspective, it can be comprehended that mandating a unique speech across the globe will certainly be easier for overseas traders to enhance their business offerings to the international clients thereby, surpassing the communication barrier as citing one's mother tongue sometimes, may hinder such dealings. In order to grab these opportunities, a few nations, tend to opt for a second style of speaking to incentivise their trade. For instance, a male-grooming kit brand can be restricted only to the nationwide distribution network if it fails to promote to a global scale whilst, it's competitors can grow up the ladder easily.
On the contrary, language indeed represents the essence of any region besides, it also unveils the originality of an area. Hence, folks entrust that it is significantly advantageous for their society to stand out from the herd, which in my opinion is extremely required. Albeit, the fact that a foreign linguistic is only limited to enterprise-related works without hampering their cultural norms. For example, India is well-known for Khadi clothing style, started by Mahatma Gandhi and it is still preserving the persona of the country's culture.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that though a plethora of financial tradings can be obtained, a national language must not only be preserved but promoted as well, so as to protect the individuality of a society. Furthermore, I firmly believe that making a common dialect may be a feasible solution for short-term growth however, in the long-run, it will certainly become monotonous. In order to sustain diversity and unity both, equilibrium needs to be maintained between the societies. 
 Undoubtedly
,  
today
's world is inclining towards  
globalisation
 at a  
fast
 pace which has led to setting up of one global style for work communication like English, to be specific. This has  
also
  given
 birth to the following notion of implementing a single dialect worldwide, which  
some
  people
, including me, believe that it is not a satisfactory step. This essay will discuss the same in detail along with certain references  
in regards to
 the argument. 
First
 and foremost, upon observing from an employment perspective, it can  
be comprehended
 that mandating a unique speech across the globe will  
certainly
 be easier for overseas traders to enhance their business offerings to the international clients thereby, surpassing the communication barrier as citing one's mother tongue  
sometimes
, may hinder such dealings. In order to grab these opportunities, a few nations, tend to opt for a second style of speaking to  
incentivise
 their trade.  
For instance
, a male-grooming kit brand can  
be restricted
  only
 to the nationwide distribution network if it fails to promote to a global scale whilst, it's competitors can grow up the ladder  
easily
. 
On the contrary
, language  
indeed
 represents the essence of any region  
besides
, it  
also
 unveils the originality of an area.  
Hence
, folks entrust that it is  
significantly
 advantageous for their society to stand out from the herd, which in my opinion is  
extremely
 required. Albeit, the fact that a foreign linguistic is  
only
 limited to enterprise-related works without hampering their cultural norms.  
For example
, India is well-known for  
Khadi
 clothing style,  
started
 by Mahatma Gandhi and it is  
still
 preserving the persona of the country's culture. 
In conclusion
, I would like to emphasize that though a plethora of financial tradings can  
be obtained
, a national language  
must
 not  
only
  be preserved
  but
 promoted  
as well
,  
so as to
 protect the individuality of a society.  
Furthermore
, I  
firmly
 believe that making a common dialect may be a feasible solution for short-term growth  
however
, in the long-run, it will  
certainly
 become monotonous. In order to sustain diversity and unity both, equilibrium needs to  
be maintained
 between the societies.