while most of the museums have imposed entry fees for the tourists, few of them still offers free entry. Although charging the entry fee would cause the benefits of excellent maintenance of such facilities, it would badly hurt the overall economy and hence I firmly believe that advantages of putting a price on museum entry do not outweigh its disadvantages.
The obvious positive development of implementing the entrance fee is effective maintenance of such valuable facilities. As it is critical to take care of these public properties with limitations of funds. In this case, charging the entrance fee would generate funds so that these museums can finance themselves for proper look after. For instance, as per survey conducted by a traveling website, The Central Museum in London with paid entry is top rated against those where entry is free.
The major drawback of this practice would be in the form of a substantial economic loss to the country because it would limit the number of visitors. Such admission fees to the iconic places like museums discourages people to visit those places and hence the local business would suffers and ultimately would effect the overall economy. For example, the number of tourists reduced by 65% when Lahore fort museum applied tickets to the entrance. For this reason, admission fee is for sure causing more harm than any good.
To conclude, in contrast to some paid entrance to the museums, others offer pay less entry. Despite apparent advantages of this phenomenon such as better care, I am clearly in the favor of the idea that they cannot outweigh the negative effects like financial loss to the local market.
while
most of the
museums
have imposed
entry
fees
for the tourists, few of them
still
offers free
entry
. Although charging the
entry
fee
would cause the benefits of excellent maintenance of such facilities, it would
badly
hurt the
overall
economy and
hence
I
firmly
believe that advantages of putting a price on
museum
entry
do not outweigh its disadvantages.
The obvious
positive
development of implementing the
entrance
fee
is effective maintenance of such valuable facilities.
As
it is critical to take care of these public properties with limitations of funds.
In this case
, charging the
entrance
fee
would generate funds
so
that these
museums
can finance themselves for proper look after.
For instance
, as per survey conducted by a traveling website, The Central
Museum
in London with paid
entry
is top rated against those where
entry
is free.
The major drawback of this practice would be in the form of a substantial economic loss to the country
because
it would limit the number of visitors. Such admission
fees
to the iconic places like
museums
discourages
people
to visit those places and
hence
the local business would
suffers
and
ultimately
would
effect
the
overall
economy.
For example
, the number of tourists
reduced
by 65% when Lahore fort
museum
applied tickets to the
entrance
.
For this reason
, admission
fee
is for sure causing more harm than any
good
.
To conclude
,
in contrast
to
some
paid
entrance
to the
museums
, others offer pay less
entry
. Despite apparent advantages of this phenomenon such as better care, I am
clearly
in the favor of the
idea
that they cannot outweigh the
negative
effects like financial loss to the local market.
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
24Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes