The passage gives a positive view on the quality of altruism. It suggests that altruism is the act of acting selfless and doing good for others. The passage gives examples of humans donating vital organs to friends and families, in times of need. It also give a second example of Meerkats. The professor makes counter points to each of these acts. She mentions that though these acts would be considered selfless it could have been developed out of selfish motives.
The passage states how meerkats protect each other. One of the meerkat's always stands as a guard outside the burrow while others are eating or searching for food. This way the meerkat is prone to serious danger. Firstly, since its standing alone there are more chances of it being attacked by the predator. The second atruistic quality it shows is that while others are eating, it sacrifices food for guarding the group members. The professor states by referencing research work that the meerkat guard is the one who eats the first. Only then, does it agree to guard others. Also since it stands just outside the burrow there are more chances that on spotting the predator it would be the first one to run away. Also the alarm that the meerkat signals would distract the predator's attention from the guard to the other meerkats.
The passage tells how humans donate organs to family and friend which in turn shows altruism. The professor rejects this as an act of altruism. She stated that some humans crave for appreciation, praise and approval from society. For such humans non materialistic rewards matter more than materialistic rewards. So for gaining these non materialistic rewards, an individual could donate even vital body organs.
This is how there is a contrast of opinions in the passage with that of what is mentioned by the professor in the lecture. Altruism according to the passage is complete selflessness but altruism according to the professor is selflessness arising mainly due to selfishness.
The
passage
gives a
positive
view on the quality of
altruism
. It suggests that
altruism
is the
act
of acting selfless and doing
good
for others. The
passage
gives examples of
humans
donating vital organs to friends and families, in times of need. It
also
give
a second example of
Meerkats
. The
professor
makes
counter points to each of these
acts
. She mentions that though these
acts
would
be considered
selfless it could have
been developed
out of selfish motives.
The
passage
states how
meerkats
protect each
other
. One of the
meerkat
's always stands as a
guard
outside the burrow while others are eating or searching for food. This way the
meerkat
is prone to serious
danger
.
Firstly
, since its standing alone there are more chances of it
being attacked
by the predator. The second
atruistic
quality it
shows
is that while others are eating, it sacrifices food for guarding the group members. The
professor
states by referencing research work that the
meerkat
guard
is the one who eats the
first
.
Only
then, does it
agree
to
guard
others.
Also
since it stands
just
outside the burrow there are more chances that on spotting the predator it would be the
first
one to run away.
Also
the alarm that the
meerkat
signals would distract the predator's attention from the
guard
to the
other
meerkats
.
The
passage
tells
how
humans
donate organs to family and friend which in turn
shows
altruism
. The
professor
rejects this as an
act
of
altruism
. She stated that
some
humans
crave for appreciation, praise and approval from society. For such
humans
non materialistic
rewards matter more than materialistic rewards.
So
for gaining these
non materialistic
rewards, an individual could donate even vital body organs.
This is how there is a contrast of opinions in the
passage
with that of what
is mentioned
by the
professor
in the lecture.
Altruism
according to the
passage
is complete selflessness
but
altruism
according to the
professor
is selflessness arising
mainly
due to selfishness.