In this set of material, the article states that the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States-bird in particular and provids three reasons of supports. However, the professor explains that it isn't true that it will be declining in the number of birds and refutes each of author's reasons.
First, the reading states that human populations and settlement continue to expand, bird's natural habitats will continue to disappear. On the contrary, the professor refutes this point by saying that human populations are not effect on the number of bird because there are many birds in city, even Hawkes and falcons, sometimes will effect some species but not all birds.
Second, the article claims that agriculture activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. However, the professor contends that human will not cut trees because there are good corps in these trees. People are using these corps.
Third, the reading avers that the pesticides will hurt birds. Conversely, the lecture opposes this point by saying that it is true that some pesticides are hurt bird. Researchers are developing new pesticide that it is low poison, and they also are developing new corps that it will be resisting to pests.
In this set of material, the article states that the
human
population
and the corresponding increase in agriculture and
pesticide
use
have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States-bird
in particular
and
provids
three reasons of supports.
However
, the professor
explains
that it isn't true that it will be declining in the number of
birds
and refutes each of author's reasons.
First
, the reading states that
human
populations
and settlement continue to expand, bird's natural habitats will continue to disappear.
On the contrary
, the professor refutes this point by saying that
human
populations
are not
effect
on the number of
bird
because
there are
many
birds
in city, even
Hawkes
and falcons,
sometimes will effect
some
species
but
not all birds.
Second, the article claims that agriculture activities
must
increase to
keep
pace with the growing
human
population
.
However
, the professor contends that
human
will not
cut
trees
because
there are
good
corps in these trees.
People
are using these corps.
Third, the reading avers that the
pesticides
will hurt
birds
.
Conversely
, the lecture opposes this point by saying that it is true that
some
pesticides
are hurt
bird
. Researchers are developing new
pesticide
that it is low poison, and they
also
are developing new corps that it will be resisting to pests.