Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In many countries, wood is the primary fuel used for heating and cooking, but wood smoke can cause respiratory and eye problems, and extensive use of wood causes deforestation, a major environmental problem. In contrast, charcoal, made by partially burnin

In many countries, wood is the primary fuel used for heating and cooking, but wood smoke can cause respiratory and eye problems, and extensive use of wood causes deforestation, a major environmental problem. In contrast, charcoal, made by partially burnin ljxwb
The author of the argument has cited that in some countries people are still using wood as their major fuel for cooking and heating and smoke generated by it causes health problems. The author also mentioned that by replacing it with charcoal can reduce smoke and health problems will be decreased. The argument might seem convincing at first glance, However, a critical analysis of the justification supplied by the author has highlighted many queries. Therefore, the premises in their current form are not cogent and the argument is rife with unwarranted assumptions which make it more susceptible to attacks. On the first facet, the author has cited that if people will switch to charcoal then it would be a solution to major environmental problem deforestation. However, the author has failed to consider a fact that coal is also made from wood only and if people will switch to coal then also deforestation will occur. The problem is still persisting hence, there is a clear dichotomy in the author's argument and the author has failed to answer that. Secondly, the author has mentioned that in many countries people use wood as a major fuel, but how many people are using is still a question to ask. Moreover, he has mentioned people without economic hardship can switch to coal because it is slightly costly than wood. However, if people there are not experiencing economic hardships then they can switch to LPG or PNG also. These fuels are more environmentally and health-friendly than wood or coal. There is a possibility that people who are using wood for heating and cooking are very poor. And it raises another question that, how many people in the countries are using wood? Maybe the number is very small and nearly negligible when compared to other factors resulting in deforestation, such as forest fire, builder making buildings or deforestation for making furniture. Additionally, the author has cited that smoke generated from burning wood causes respiratory and eye problems. However, coal is also developed from processing woods and it also produces smoke. Maybe the smoke produced by burning coal is more pernicious than smoke generated by burning wood. The author has not provided any evidence about that and naively concluded just by saying it the smoke created by burning coal is less. In the crux, the author's argument is based on unsubstantiated presumptions. The author should have reinforced his argument with evidence to make his case more convincing. However, the author has failed to check the facts that there are many other options for the people who can afford it and the problem for deforestation still persist, thereby rendering the argument indefensible.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
has cited that in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
countries
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are
still
using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
as their major fuel for cooking and heating and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
generated by it causes health
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
also
mentioned that by replacing it with charcoal can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
and health
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
will
be decreased
.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
might seem convincing at
first
glance,
However
, a critical analysis of the justification supplied by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has highlighted
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
queries.
Therefore
, the premises in their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
form are not cogent and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
is rife with unwarranted assumptions which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it more susceptible to attacks.

On the
first
facet, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has cited that if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switch
to charcoal then it would be a solution to major environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has failed to consider a fact that coal is
also
made from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
and if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switch
to coal then
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
will occur. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
is
still
persisting
hence
, there is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
dichotomy in the author's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has failed to answer that.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has mentioned that in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
as a major fuel,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are using is
still
a question to ask.
Moreover
, he has mentioned
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
without economic hardship can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switch
to coal
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is
slightly
Use "costlier" to make a comparison with this adjective.
costly
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
.
However
, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
there are not experiencing economic hardships then they can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switch
to LPG or PNG
also
. These fuels are more
environmentally
and health-friendly than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
or coal. There is a possibility that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who are using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
for heating and cooking are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
poor. And it raises another question that, how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in the countries are using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
? Maybe the number is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
and
nearly
negligible when compared to other factors resulting in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
, such as forest fire, builder making buildings or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
for making furniture.

Additionally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has cited that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
generated from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
causes respiratory and eye
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
.
However
, coal is
also
developed from processing woods and it
also
produces
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
. Maybe the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
produced by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
coal is more pernicious than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
generated by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wood
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has not provided any evidence about that and
naively
concluded
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
by saying it the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoke
created by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
coal is less.

In the crux, the author's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
is based
on unsubstantiated presumptions. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
should have reinforced his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
with evidence to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
his case more convincing.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
has failed to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
the facts that there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
other options for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who can afford it and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
still
persist, thereby rendering the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
indefensible.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In many countries, wood is the primary fuel used for heating and cooking, but wood smoke can cause respiratory and eye problems, and extensive use of wood causes deforestation, a major environmental problem. In contrast, charcoal, made by partially burnin

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
443 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • In many countries, wood is the primary fuel used for heating and cooking, but wood smoke can cause respiratory and eye problems, and extensive use of wood causes deforestation, a major environmental problem. In contrast, charcoal, made by partially burnin