People have different views about whether governments should introduce a maximum
wage. While in some ways it may seem reasonable to allow people to earn as much as
companies are willing to pay, I personally believe that employee remuneration should
be capped at a certain level.
There are various reasons why it might be considered beneficial to allow people to be
paid extremely high salaries. If companies offer excellent pay packages, they can attract
the most talented people in their fields to work for them. For example, technology
companies like Google are able to employ the best programmers because of the huge
sums that they are willing to pay. Furthermore, these well-paid employees are likely to
be highly motivated to work hard and therefore drive their businesses successfully. In
theory, this should result in a thriving economy and increased tax revenues, which
means that paying high salaries benefits everyone.
However, I agree with those who argue that there should be a maximum wage. By
introducing a limit on earnings, the pay-gap between bosses and employees can be
reduced. Currently, the difference between normal and top salaries is huge, and this
can demotivate workers who feel that the situation is unfair. With lower executive
salaries, it might become feasible to introduce higher minimum wages, and everybody
would be better off. One possible consequence of greater equality could be that poverty
and crime rates fall because the general population will experience an improved
standard of living.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be better, on balance, for governments to set
a limit on the wages of the highest earners in society. 
 People
 have  
different
 views about whether  
governments
 should introduce a maximum
wage. While in  
some
 ways it may seem reasonable to  
allow
  people
 to earn as much as 
companies
 are willing to pay, I  
personally
 believe that employee remuneration should 
be capped
 at a certain level.
There are various reasons why it might  
be considered
 beneficial to  
allow
  people
 to  
be
paid
  extremely
 high salaries. If  
companies
 offer excellent pay packages, they can attract
the most talented  
people
 in their fields to work for them.  
For example
, technology 
companies
 like Google are able to employ the best programmers  
because
 of the huge
sums that they are willing to pay.  
Furthermore
, these well-paid employees are likely to
be  
highly
 motivated to work  
hard
 and  
therefore
 drive their businesses  
successfully
. In
theory, this should result in a thriving economy and increased tax revenues, which
means that paying high salaries benefits everyone. 
However
, I  
agree
 with those who argue that there should be a maximum wage. By
introducing a limit on earnings, the pay-gap between bosses and employees can be 
reduced
.  
Currently
, the difference between normal and top salaries is huge, and this
can demotivate workers who feel that the situation is unfair. With lower executive
salaries, it might become feasible to introduce higher minimum wages, and everybody
would be better off. One possible consequence of greater equality could be that poverty
and crime rates fall  
because
 the general population will experience an  
improved
standard of living. 
In conclusion
, it seems to me that it would be better, on balance, for  
governments
 to set
a limit on the wages of the highest earners in society.