Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Government investment in arts, such as music and theater, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Government investment in arts, such as music and theater, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead. lpno
The perceptions among people for issues in pursuit of revenue made and equivocally invested in various sectors by the government of their country has always been au contraire. However, it is undoubtedly the affair of utmost significance and must be with all options, addressed and recognized. These convictions, at times, establish a propaganda that if not moderated can render the future for a social domain, bleak. The hypothesis based on these convictions proposes that art, such as music and theater, does not stand the rightful recipient of government expense as do other public services; such as health care, transportation, education, infrastructure et cetera. I vociferously disagree with the given statement. Some people have proven to be resourceful, tenacious with a commendable ability to convince others that their way is the right way, the way that needs to be followed, pursued despite the obvious repercussions such actions may incur. The primacy of these dominant yet dissimilar to the subjugated is undeniable. However, art in all its forms; be it music, theater, painting, is a constructive element of society. It cannot be disregarded in comparison to former. Music and entertainment provides people escape from the assiduous livelihood that they have fashioned for theirselves; consequently recuperating them for modus operandi. Government should remain the constituent pillar and should encourage all forms of art; for art is not only just a notion of luxury and delicacy, but the genesis of all cultures. The constitution of a country mandates the progress of bourgeoisie, thereby preservation of its cultural artifacts accentuates its merit and manifests the country as a positive contributor to the history. William Shakespeare, Van Gogh, Leonardo da Vinci, Ludwig van Beethoven and many others in the ambit have delivered art ne plus ultra which, till Armageddon exists reverenced. So conclusively, foregrounding other domains that seem substantial, with the capital meant for art is not legitimate.
The perceptions among
people
for issues in pursuit of revenue made and
equivocally
invested in various sectors by the
government
of their country has always been au contraire.
However
, it is
undoubtedly
the affair of utmost significance and
must
be with all options, addressed and recognized. These convictions, at times, establish a propaganda that if not moderated can render the future for a social domain, bleak. The hypothesis based on these convictions proposes that
art
, such as music and theater, does not stand the rightful recipient of
government
expense as do
other
public services; such as health care, transportation, education, infrastructure
et cetera
. I
vociferously
disagree with the
given
statement.

Some
people
have proven to be resourceful, tenacious with a commendable ability to convince others that their way is the right way, the way that needs to
be followed
, pursued despite the obvious repercussions such actions may incur. The primacy of these dominant
yet
dissimilar to the subjugated is undeniable.
However
,
art
in all its forms; be it music, theater, painting, is a constructive element of society. It cannot
be disregarded
in comparison
to former. Music and entertainment provides
people
escape from the assiduous livelihood that they have fashioned for
theirselves
;
consequently
recuperating them for modus operandi.
Government
should remain the constituent pillar and should encourage all forms of
art
; for
art
is not
only
just
a notion of luxury and delicacy,
but
the genesis of all cultures. The constitution of a country mandates the progress of bourgeoisie, thereby preservation of its cultural artifacts accentuates its merit and manifests the country as a
positive
contributor to the history.

William Shakespeare, Van Gogh, Leonardo da Vinci, Ludwig van Beethoven and
many
others in the ambit have delivered
art
ne plus ultra which, till Armageddon exists reverenced.
So
conclusively
, foregrounding
other
domains that seem substantial, with the capital meant for
art
is not legitimate.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Government investment in arts, such as music and theater, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
312 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts