During times of economic crisis, which area of spending do you think the government should reduce: education, healthcare or support for the unemployed?
During times of economic crisis, which area of spending do you think the government should reduce: education, healthcare or support for the unemployed? 15mWW
Nowadays, many countries are dealing with economic crisis which the governments try to handle the crisis by changing budgets in each area hoping to finish the economic condition in the shortest time. One of the controversial topics in these situations is that government should cut budgets in which field: education, health care, or support for the unemployed? In my point of view, cutting the budget of education cannot produce detrimental effects in a short time, hence, seemingly it is the best option among these three suggestions. My statement will be substantiated by the following paragraphs.
To begin with, during economic crises many people experience financial problems, hence, they cannot eat nutritive food adequately. Hence, the rate of sickness is increased among people. In addition, due to the financial problems, the number of people suffered from depression and mental disorders will increase, as well. In this situation, the government must carefully see the bad consequences of economic condition on health of people and plan for managing it. Therefore, cutting budget of health care system is not possible at all.
Secondly, the rate of unemployment is strongly related to the economic condition of a society. The more unemployment rate is, the low prosperity in economy is. Thus, the first goal of governments must be reducing the rate of unemployment so as to manage the economic condition in a shorter time. It is noteworthy mentioning that in such situations which the number of unemployed persons drastically increases, many of them, particularly young people, immigrate to the other countries to find a job which it makes the economic condition worse than previous due to missing young people. In this regard, cutting budget from this section is the worst decision, in my opinion.
Finally, it is universally accepted that educational system in each country is the basis for countries. An effect educational system can play a pivot role in thriving of the society. However, it is believed that effects of educational systems are seen after at least 10 years. Therefore, in economic crises, educational system can be considered as a potential candidate to cut its budget. Although cutting budget of educational system can be reduced the pace of advancement, it does not affect everyday life of people.
Due to the aforementioned ground, I firmly believe that cutting budget of educational system during economic crises is less harmful in comparison with cutting budgets from health care or support of unemployment rate.
Nowadays,
many
countries
are dealing with
economic
crisis which the
governments
try to handle the crisis by changing
budgets
in each area hoping to finish the
economic
condition
in the shortest time. One of the controversial topics in these situations is that
government
should
cut
budgets
in which field: education,
health
care, or support for the unemployed? In my point of view,
cutting
the
budget
of education cannot produce detrimental effects in a short time,
hence
,
seemingly
it is the best option among these three suggestions. My statement will
be substantiated
by the following paragraphs.
To
begin
with, during
economic
crises
many
people
experience financial problems,
hence
, they cannot eat nutritive food
adequately
.
Hence
, the
rate
of sickness
is increased
among
people
.
In addition
, due to the financial problems, the number of
people
suffered from depression and mental disorders will increase,
as well
. In this situation, the
government
must
carefully
see
the
bad
consequences of
economic
condition
on
health
of
people
and plan for managing it.
Therefore
,
cutting
budget
of
health
care
system
is not possible at all.
Secondly
, the
rate
of
unemployment
is
strongly
related to the
economic
condition
of a society. The more
unemployment
rate
is, the low prosperity in economy is.
Thus
, the
first
goal of
governments
must
be reducing the
rate
of
unemployment
so as to
manage the
economic
condition
in a shorter time. It is noteworthy mentioning that in such situations which the number of unemployed persons
drastically
increases,
many
of them,
particularly
young
people
, immigrate to the other
countries
to find a job which it
makes
the
economic
condition
worse than previous due to missing young
people
. In this regard,
cutting
budget
from this section is the worst decision, in my opinion.
Finally
, it is
universally
accepted
that
educational
system
in each
country
is the basis for
countries
. An effect
educational
system
can play a pivot role in thriving of the society.
However
, it
is believed
that effects of
educational
systems
are
seen
after at least 10 years.
Therefore
, in
economic
crises,
educational
system
can
be considered
as a potential candidate to
cut
its
budget
. Although
cutting
budget
of
educational
system
can be
reduced
the pace of advancement, it does not affect everyday life of
people
.
Due to the aforementioned ground, I
firmly
believe that
cutting
budget
of
educational
system
during
economic
crises is less harmful
in comparison
with
cutting
budgets
from
health
care or support of
unemployment
rate
.