Recently, the phenomenon of participating in voting elections and giving the driving lisence to the youths who are under the 25 years old and their corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although these allowances are beneficial as they are regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that they can be plus if they run by considering some issues.
From a social standpoint, the idea of giving premission to the young generation who are below the 25 years old to vote or drive provides society with the noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of legislating strict legislation. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment whch discovered these benefits. firstly, this issue have positive effects on children's attitudes abd behaviour and enhance their confidence. Furthermore, it might develop some other skills including social, community, decision making and teamwork skills. Moreover, encountering the young people to such these situations like have the ability to choose their popular politicians or their own style of driving might increase their responsibilities.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of permitting the youngsters to attend the elections and drive by their own cars have some opponents. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, the young people blamed for the significance proportion of roud accidents. In addition, the opponents asserted that this part of nation have inadequate ability to think ideally and they are not competent to vote or drive.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of permitting the youths under 25 years old to drive and vote are far more outweigh their demerits.
Recently, the phenomenon of participating in voting elections and giving the driving
lisence
to the youths who are under the 25 years
old
and their corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although these allowances are beneficial as they
are regarded
by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and
positive
, others hold opponent views. I
am inclined
to believe that they can be plus if they run by considering
some
issues.
From a social standpoint, the
idea
of giving
premission
to the young generation who are below the 25 years
old
to vote or drive provides society with the noticeable effects which
are rooted
in the fact of legislating strict legislation. From my
own
experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment
whch
discovered these benefits.
firstly
, this issue have
positive
effects on children's attitudes
abd
behaviour
and enhance their confidence.
Furthermore
, it might develop
some
other
skills
including social, community,
decision making
and teamwork
skills
.
Moreover
, encountering the young
people
to such these situations like have the ability to choose their popular politicians or their
own
style of driving might increase their responsibilities.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the
idea
of permitting the youngsters to attend the elections and drive by their
own
cars have
some
opponents. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, the young
people
blamed for the significance proportion of
roud
accidents.
In addition
, the opponents asserted that this part of nation have inadequate ability to
think
ideally and
they are not competent to vote or drive.
In conclusion
, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I
profoundly
believe that the merits of permitting the youths under 25 years
old
to drive and vote are far more outweigh their demerits.