Earning money for survive a life is mandatory. In our culture it is fact that directors of huge organizations earning more than ordinary employees but one school of thought asserts that it is unfair, while some people believe that it is necessary. Both the views are discussed in trail paragraphs, keeping wages of directors and employees as focal point, before reaching the logical conclusion.
First and foremost reason for providing more salaries to directors of big organization is that they have less work but more responsibility compare to employees and authority gives more risk of loosing job because if employees do something wrong but directors do not check it properly then it is loss of directors not others. Also, directors are more experienced couple with the higher source knowledge and education so they deserve more salaries for these qualities. Moreover, directors are boss when owner is not present so their position is also high. Due to all these reasons directors deserve more compensation for their duty and work.
In sharp contrast, ordinary employees have more work, they are working from dawn to dusk for that company or organization and some are there who dedicate their whole life solely to the one corporation but they do not earn more than directors. In terms of their hard work and dedication is biasness to give less salaries to them compare to directors because directors because directors are there because of employees so employees are base of that organization, however, they have only knowledge of the area in which they are working not the other fields of company and to become director of organization they must have wide range of knowledge and ideas to bring the corporation at top level.
Weighing both the views, it can be concluded that it is not unfair or partiality between directors and employees because knowledge, productivity, responsibility, and experience are more essential than work for organization. Hence, directors deserves high wages.
Earning money for survive a life is mandatory. In our culture it is fact that
directors
of huge
organizations
earning more than ordinary
employees
but
one school of
thought
asserts that it is unfair, while
some
people
believe that it is necessary. Both the views
are discussed
in trail paragraphs, keeping wages of
directors
and
employees
as focal point,
before
reaching the logical conclusion.
First
and foremost reason for providing more salaries to
directors
of
big
organization
is that they have less
work
but
more responsibility compare to
employees
and authority gives more
risk
of loosing job
because
if
employees
do something
wrong
but
directors
do not
check
it
properly
then it is loss of
directors
not others.
Also
,
directors
are more experienced couple with the higher source
knowledge
and education
so
they deserve more salaries for these qualities.
Moreover
,
directors
are boss when owner is not present
so
their position is
also
high. Due to all these reasons
directors
deserve more compensation for their duty and work.
In sharp contrast, ordinary
employees
have more
work
, they are working from dawn to dusk for that
company
or
organization
and
some
are there who dedicate their whole life
solely
to the one corporation
but
they do not earn more than
directors
. In terms of their
hard
work
and dedication is
biasness
to give
less
salaries to them compare to
directors
because
directors
because
directors
are there
because
of
employees
so
employees
are base of that
organization
,
however
, they have
only
knowledge
of the area in which they are working not the other fields of
company
and to become
director
of
organization
they
must
have wide range of
knowledge
and
ideas
to bring the corporation at
top level
.
Weighing both the views, it can
be concluded
that it is not unfair or partiality between
directors
and
employees
because
knowledge
, productivity, responsibility, and experience are more essential than
work
for
organization
.
Hence
,
directors
deserves high wages.