Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use ofChemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X iscovered under stringent environmental regulations, making it ver

Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use ofChemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X iscovered under stringent environmental regulations, making it ver 3agJw
The author states that Cot-Ten company recently faced profitability with the use of chemical X which is expensive to dispose. So, the company decided to substitute the chemical X with the newly discovered chemical Y. However, the proposal contains some flaws and will not be accepted if the conclusion fails to answer some question. Moreover, the questions draw some critical assumption which is important to draw an accurate conclusion. Firstly, the author claims that the chemical Y is minimum cost of disposing of than chemical X. But, chemical Y may be harmful to the environment and company Cot-Ten does not take any step to investigate on the chemical Y how it harms the environment. Moreover, without proper investigation dispose of any chemical may harm humans health which could not see immediately but works insidiously. Thus, company should more research on chemical Y before disposing of. Secondly, for disposing of chemical Y the total cost is not shown by the author and also the chemical X. However, chemical Y is newly discovered by company and need to more awareness among the employee of the company before use. So, the company needs to arrange a workshop or training program for the employee and various different infrastructure to increse the adaptability of the chemical Y. For this problem, the company needs to more accurate calculation on the cost. So, this assumption is undermining the proposed statement. Moreover, the CEO did not mention the production of the cotton. It might be possible that chemical Y is harmful to the production of cotton. Then the company will face profitability issue. It is important to more analysis to chemical Y on the production. It is also possible that chemical Y effects the overall production of the cotton and creates more injurious or poisonous gas in the environment. So, CEO needs more clarification on the chemical Y. To conclude that the overall hypothesis is very interesting but it has some critical flaws and without correction, it cannot be accepted. So, more information is reqiured to validate the statement.
The author states that Cot-Ten
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
recently faced profitability with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
X which is expensive to dispose.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
decided to substitute the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
X with the
newly
discovered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y.
However
, the proposal contains
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
flaws and will not be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
accepted
if the conclusion fails to answer
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
question.
Moreover
, the questions draw
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
critical assumption which is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
to draw an accurate conclusion.

Firstly
, the author claims that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y is minimum cost of disposing of than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
X.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y may be harmful to the environment and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
Cot-Ten does not take any step to investigate on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y how it harms the environment.
Moreover
, without proper investigation dispose of any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
may harm humans health which could not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
immediately
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
works
insidiously
.
Thus
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
should more research on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
disposing of.

Secondly
, for disposing of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y the total cost is not shown by the author and
also
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
X.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y is
newly
discovered by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
need
to more awareness among the employee of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
to arrange a workshop or training program for the employee and various
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
infrastructure to
Possible spelling mistake found.
increse
the adaptability of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y. For this problem, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
to more accurate calculation on the cost.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, this assumption is undermining the proposed statement.

Moreover
, the CEO did not mention the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of the cotton. It might be possible that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y is harmful to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of cotton. Then the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
will face profitability issue. It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
to more analysis to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
. It is
also
possible that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y effects the
overall
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of the cotton and creates more injurious or poisonous gas in the environment.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, CEO
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
more clarification on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chemical
Y.

To conclude
that the
overall
hypothesis is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
interesting
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
critical flaws and without correction, it cannot be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
accepted
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, more information is
Possible spelling mistake found.
reqiured
to validate the statement.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use ofChemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X iscovered under stringent environmental regulations, making it ver

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
341 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use ofChemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X iscovered under stringent environmental regulations, making it ver