Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Both the reading passage and professor's lecture discuss whether the fine lines were feathers or not.

Both the reading passage and professor's lecture discuss whether the fine lines were feathers or not. GMoGg
Both the reading passage and professor's lecture discuss whether the fine lines were feathers or not. The reading passage shows that the fine lines were not the feathers because they might be the fibers' decomposition, remains of frills, or mis-located. However, the professor discords with the issues in the reading passage. He thinks that three theorems presented in the reading are questionable, offering several refutations to oppose the article. First of all, the reading mentions that the fine lines were skin fibers in the fossils. Yet, the lecturer severely challenges the theory by arguing that we did not see any other animals' decomposition buried at the same time. Furthermore, he contends that many other animals' fossils were well-preserved in volcanic ash. That is, if the fine lines were the feathers, it must be well-preserved as well. Secondly, the passage suggests that the fine lines were remains of real structures, which were more likely to be frills than feathers. Nevertheless, the scholar seriously contradicts the hypothesis by asserting that the feathers had a lot of special proteins and the frills did not contain those special proteins, Moreover, the chemical analyses showed the Sinosauropteryx structures did contain the particular proteins, so it might be the feathers rather than frills. Last but not least, the reading article indicates that the structures were mostly located along the backbone and the tail of the animal, so it might not be the feathers. Once again, the speaker casts doubt on the issue by maintaining that feathers can be used for other functions. In addition, the professor takes peacock for example, and he points out that the peacock's feathers are used for attracting mates. Also, we discovered that the Sinosauropteryx's structures were colorful. Thus, it might be also used for display, just like peacock does.
Both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
and professor's lecture discuss whether the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lines
were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
or not. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lines
were not the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
be the fibers' decomposition, remains of frills, or
Possible spelling mistake found.
mis-located
.
However
, the professor discords with the issues in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
. He
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thinks
that three theorems presented in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
are questionable, offering several refutations to oppose the article.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
mentions that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lines
were skin fibers in the fossils.
Yet
, the lecturer
severely
challenges the theory by arguing that we did not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
any other animals' decomposition buried at the same time.
Furthermore
, he contends that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
other animals' fossils were well-preserved in volcanic ash.
That is
, if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lines
were the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be well-preserved
as well
.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
suggests that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lines
were remains of real
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
structures
, which were more likely to be frills than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
.
Nevertheless
, the scholar
seriously
contradicts the hypothesis by asserting that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
had
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
special proteins and the frills did not contain those special proteins,
Moreover
, the chemical analyses
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
the
Possible spelling mistake found.
Sinosauropteryx
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
structures
did contain the particular proteins,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
be the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
rather
than frills.

Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not least, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
article indicates that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
structures
were
mostly
located along the backbone and the tail of the animal,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
not be the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
. Once again, the speaker casts doubt on the issue by maintaining that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for other functions.
In addition
, the professor takes peacock
for example
, and he points out that the peacock's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
feathers
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for attracting mates.
Also
, we discovered that the
Possible spelling mistake found.
Sinosauropteryx
's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
structures
were colorful.
Thus
, it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
be
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for display,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
like peacock does.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Both the reading passage and professor's lecture discuss whether the fine lines were feathers or not.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
298 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Both the reading passage and professor's lecture discuss whether the fine lines were feathers or not.