Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

alternative sources like wind are more positive than fossil fuels sich as oil and gasagree or disagree?

alternative sources like wind are more positive than fossil fuels sich as oil and gasagree or disagree? wBmgE
Fossil fuels known as one of the most important resources of energy in worldwide. Beside this, in recent decades, use of other sources e. g: wind, solar and even nuclear energy increase strictly in many countries. I strongly believe that using of these sources have many advantages for individuals and governments, and is a positive invest. There are several reasons for this view that alternative sources such as wind or solar are beneficial for people. In my view, the most important reason is, reduce pollution in cities, and decrease of disease among individuals. Nowadays, the majority of cars and companies utilize of fossil fuels for energy production. The emission of toxic gases from these machines like CO2 and CO can have detrimental impacts on the individual’s healthy and ozone layer. The hearth problem and breath damages because of air pollution are the sample of these diseases. In addition, penetrate of ozone layer also, lead to publish of X-ray on the surface earth, that is destructive for human skin, and can become cause of skin illnesses. Alternative energies, not only, do not have any above negative effects, but also help to air pollution and do not have harmful for people. For this reason are suitable for using. Another reason for being benefit alternative sources is, these resources are infinity and cheaper than fossil fuels. According to witnesses of researcher, fossil fuels (e. g: oil, coil and gas) will finish by 2050. Therefore, the governments should find other sources for replacing it. Wind and solar are the best substitute because, they are accessible everywhere and also, have a sufficient powerful for energy production in companies and cars. Likewise, the cost of their production is much inexpensive compared to fossil fuels. We need the advance technologies and machines for drilling earth and extraction of petroleum or gas. But, for producing of solar energy, for example, we need the number of plate placed in front of the sun. To sum up, utilization of replacing sources like wind or solar instead of fossil fuels, is an excellent idea not only for people throughout the world because of reducing illness(e. g: hearth and skin ailments), but also is beneficial for government because they are economical and available.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
known as one of the most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
resources of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in worldwide. Beside this, in recent decades,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
e. g:
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
and even nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
increase
strictly
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries. I
strongly
believe that using of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
advantages for individuals and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
, and is a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
invest.

There are several
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reasons
for this view that alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
such as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
are beneficial for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. In my view, the most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reason
is,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
pollution in cities, and decrease of disease among individuals. Nowadays, the majority of cars and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
utilize of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production. The emission of toxic gases from these machines like CO2 and CO can have detrimental impacts on the individual’s healthy and ozone layer. The hearth problem and breath damages
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of air pollution are the sample of these diseases.
In addition
, penetrate of ozone layer
also
, lead to publish of X-ray on the surface earth,
that is
destructive for human skin, and can become cause of skin illnesses. Alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energies
, not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
, do not have any above
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
effects,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
to air pollution and do not have harmful for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. For this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reason
are suitable for using.

Another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reason
for being benefit alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
is, these resources are infinity and cheaper than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
. According to witnesses of researcher,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
(e. g: oil, coil and gas) will finish by 2050.
Therefore
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should find other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
for replacing it.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Wind
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
are the best substitute
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
, they are accessible everywhere and
also
, have a sufficient powerful for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
and cars.
Likewise
, the cost of their production is much inexpensive compared to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
. We need the advance technologies and machines for drilling earth and extraction of petroleum or gas.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
, for producing of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
,
for example
, we need the number of plate placed in front of the sun.

To sum up, utilization of replacing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
like
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
, is an excellent
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
throughout the world
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of reducing illness(e. g: hearth and skin ailments),
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
is beneficial for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they are economical and available.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay alternative sources like wind are more positive than fossil fuels sich as oil and gasagree or disagree?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
371 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • alternative sources like wind are more positive than fossil fuels sich as oil and gasagree or disagree?