Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph gives the recycling ratio of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010. O

The line graph gives the recycling ratio of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010. O VQWNO
The line graph gives the recycling ratio of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010. Overall, the recycling rate of glass containers fluctuated along with paper and cardboard, while aluminum cans and plastic saw growth in their percentages. Although after fluctuating paper and cardboard ended as mainly reproduced products among other items; in 1981, during the beginning, 60% of paper and cardboard was recycled which later grew up to 70% in 1996. After two periods, the regeneration of this selective item was reduced from 70% to nearly 60%. in midst of 2006 and 2010, the recorded value was almost 70%. On the other hand, glass containers were reported to have the second-most percentage of recycling. It was reproduced 5% more in the end than it's the previous value of 50% Apart from this, plastics and aluminum cand noted an increase in their production. However, cans percentages grew significantly, more than 30%, but plastic saw very minimum growth of 10%.
The line graph gives the recycling ratio of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and
plastics
from 1982 to 2010.
Overall
, the recycling rate of glass containers fluctuated along with paper and cardboard, while aluminum cans and
plastic
saw
growth in their percentages.

Although after fluctuating paper and cardboard ended as
mainly
reproduced products among other items; in 1981, during the beginning, 60% of paper and cardboard
was recycled
which later grew up to 70% in 1996. After two periods, the regeneration of this selective item was
reduced
from 70% to
nearly
60%.
in
midst of 2006 and 2010, the recorded value was almost 70%.
On the other hand
, glass containers
were reported
to have the second-most percentage of recycling. It
was reproduced
5% more in the
end
than it's the previous value of 50%

Apart from this,
plastics
and aluminum
cand
noted an increase in their production.
However
, cans percentages grew
significantly
, more than 30%,
but
plastic
saw
very
minimum growth of 10%.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph gives the recycling ratio of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics from 1982 to 2010. O

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
165 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: