Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph compares three separate companies in terms of their volumes of rubbish released between the year 2000 and 2015.

The line graph compares three separate companies in terms of their volumes of rubbish released between the year 2000 and 2015. k6oDO
The line graph compares three separate companies in terms of their volumes of rubbish released between the year 2000 and 2015. Overall, whilst the production of waste in both company A and company B witnessed a downward trend, the opposite was true for company C. Moreover, company B saw the most substantial drop of three companies. In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, whilst both of the companies B and C produced around 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of waste material respectively. Over the following 5 years, the waste released of companies B and C rose by approximately 2 tonnes, but the figure for company A fell by around 1 tonne. From 2005 to 2015, company A cut waste production by roughly 3 tonnes, and company B reduced its waste by around 7 tonnes. By contrast, company C witnessed an increase in waste production of approximately 4 tonnes over the same 10-year period. By 2015, company C’s rubbish released had risen to 10 tonnes, whilst the respective volumes of waste from companies A and B had dropped to 8 tonnes and only 3 tonnes.
The line graph compares three separate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
in terms of their volumes of rubbish released between the year 2000 and 2015.

Overall
, whilst the production of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
in both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B witnessed a downward trend, the opposite was true for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
the most substantial drop of three
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
.

In 2000,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A produced 12 tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
, whilst both of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
B and C produced around 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
material
respectively
. Over the following 5 years, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
released of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
B and C rose by approximately 2 tonnes,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the figure for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A fell by around 1 tonne.

From 2005 to 2015,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cut
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
production by roughly 3 tonnes, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
by around 7 tonnes. By contrast,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C witnessed an increase in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
production of approximately 4 tonnes over the same 10-year period. By 2015,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C’s rubbish released had risen to 10 tonnes, whilst the respective volumes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
A and B had dropped to 8 tonnes and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
3 tonnes.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph compares three separate companies in terms of their volumes of rubbish released between the year 2000 and 2015.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
186 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The line graph compares three separate companies in terms of their volumes of rubbish released between the year 2000 and 2015.