Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. gQVl
The line graph illustrates the intake types of meat like fish, lamb, beef, chicken in European countries. Moreover, what stands out from graph is that there is indicator of how many grams per person per week in period from 1979 to 2004. In 1979 initial marks of consumption of fish was around 50 grams, chicken was below 150 grams, lamb exactly 150 grams and beef slightly over 200 grams per person. In given period, there is no special changes in line of fish, also about 50 grams. As seen from graph, line of consumption of lamb significant decreased during the entire time and value of grams became 3 times less. Even, the first 5 years intake of meat of beef increased almost 250 grams. However, in 2004 such as lamb, graph of beef attained a little more than 100 grams. The only kind meat whose consumption has mostly grown is chicken. In 25 years, number of grams per person per week increased more than 1. 5 times and made chicken the most eaten meat.
The line
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
illustrates the intake types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
like fish,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
, chicken in European countries.
Moreover
, what stands out from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
is that there is indicator of how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per person per week in period from 1979 to 2004.

In 1979 initial marks of consumption of fish was around 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
, chicken was below 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
exactly 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
slightly
over 200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per person. In
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
period, there is no special
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
in line of fish,
also
about 50 grams.

As
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
, line of consumption of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
significant decreased during the entire time and value of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
became 3 times less. Even, the
first
5 years intake of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
increased almost 250
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
.
However
, in 2004 such as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
graph
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
attained a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
more than 100 grams.

The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
kind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
whose consumption has
mostly
grown is chicken. In 25 years, number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per person per week increased more than 1. 5 times and made chicken the most eaten
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meat
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
174 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.