Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The chart below shows the number of working hours per week in industry sector, in four European countries in 2002

The chart below shows the number of working hours per week in industry sector, in four European countries in 2002 Wyjjb

A glance at the bar graph provided reveals the clear difference between the amount of hours spent by industrial workers per week in France Denmark, Sweden and the UK in 2002. As an overall assessment, it is immensely clear that the maximum workers worked 36-40 hours in Denmark, Sweden and the UK, while in France the employees worked for 31-35 hours per week. In details, in Denmark, Sweden and the UK 36-40 hours per week were utilized by 70%, 80%, and 50% workers respectively, whilst the majority of workers (50%) in France, were doing thier duties for 31-35 hours per week. Almost 10% employees had been accounted to do job for 1-14 hours in all countries. 21-30 hours per week were spent in industry by 10% workers in Denmark, France and the UK whereas the proportion of labours were doubled in Sweden. Probing further, the biggest discrepancy can be seen 31- 35hours whichin 22% in Denmark, 38% in Sweden and 10% in the UK workforce performed thier duties however, in this working hours 50 percent France's labour had been done thier job. It is interesting to note that, the largest ratio of employees gave thier more than 50 hours to industry work. The wage- earners of France and the UK had been shared similar platform by doing 46- 50 hours job.

A glance at the bar graph provided reveals the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 difference between the amount of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 spent by industrial You use this word too often, consider replacing it withemployeetraderpeasantlaborer
workers
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
week
 in France Denmark, Sweden and the UK in 2002. As an overall
 assessment, it is immensely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that the maximum You use this word too often, consider replacing it withemployeetraderpeasantlaborer
workers
 worked 36-40 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 in Denmark, Sweden and the UK, while in France the employees worked for 31-35 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
week
. In This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
, in Denmark, Sweden and the UK 36-40 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
week
were utilized
 by 70%, 80%, and 50% You use this word too often, consider replacing it withemployeetraderpeasantlaborer
workers
respectively
, whilst the majority of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withemployeetraderpeasantlaborer
workers
 (50%) in France, were doing Possible spelling mistake found.theirheartierThaithiefshear
thier
 duties for 31-35 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
week
. Almost 10% employees had been accounted
 to do job for 1-14 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 in all countries. 21-30 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
week
were spent
 in industry by 10% You use this word too often, consider replacing it withemployeetraderpeasantlaborer
workers
 in Denmark, France and the UK whereas the proportion of Possible spelling mistake. 'labours' is British English.labors
labours
were doubled
 in Sweden. Probing further
, the biggest discrepancy can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 31- You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
35hours
Possible spelling mistake found.which in
whichin
 22% in Denmark, 38% in Sweden and 10% in the UK workforce performed Possible spelling mistake found.theirheartierThaithiefshear
thier
 duties however
, in this working You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 50 percent France's Possible spelling mistake. 'labour' is British English.labor
labour
 had been done
Possible spelling mistake found.theirheartierThaithiefshear
thier
 job. It is interesting to note that, the largest ratio of employees gave Possible spelling mistake found.theirheartierThaithiefshear
thier
 more than 50 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 to industry work. The wage- earners of France and the UK had been shared
 similar platform by doing Consider using an n-dash (half dash), if you want to indicate numerical ranges or time ranges.46 – 5046–50
46- 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointflashjuncturetimedateoccasion
hours
 job. 