task-1 pie chart for hotel review
task-1 pie chart for hotel review KGap1
The two pie charts illustrate the result of customer's review about the hotel for the two years of 2005 and 2010.
Overall, the highest result of customer service was several in the two different years. The upper result was satisfactory (45%), and good (39%) in 2005, and 2010, respectively.
In 2005, there were five types of services, which are excellent, good, satisfactory, poor, and very poor. The satisfactory rate achieves the highest percentage from the reviewer of the hotel. Moreover, the excellent review got the lowest percent as compared to the other options, it was only 5%. The good and very poor got the nearest marks which were 14%, and 15%, respectively. Finally, the poor service got just under one-quarter of the total percentage.
In another year of 2010, good achieved the highest result and poor got the poorer result among the services (39% and 4%). Another two services were very close to each other, which were 17% and 12% for satisfactory and poor service. Furthermore, excellent was one-fourth marks in between total outcome. 
The two pie charts illustrate the  
result
 of customer's review about the hotel for the two years of 2005 and 2010. 
Overall
, the highest  
result
 of customer  
service
 was several in the two  
different
 years. The upper  
result
 was  
satisfactory
 (45%), and  
good
 (39%) in 2005, and 2010,  
respectively
.
In 2005, there were five types of  
services
, which are excellent,  
good
,  
satisfactory
,  
poor
, and  
very
  poor
. The  
satisfactory
 rate achieves the highest percentage from the  
reviewer
 of the hotel.  
Moreover
, the excellent review  
got
 the lowest percent as compared to the other options, it was  
only
 5%. The  
good
 and  
very
  poor
  got
 the nearest marks which were 14%, and 15%,  
respectively
.  
Finally
, the  
poor
  service
  got
  just
 under one-quarter of the total percentage.
In another year of 2010,  
good
 achieved the highest  
result
 and  
poor
  got
 the poorer  
result
 among the  
services
 (39% and 4%). Another two  
services
 were  
very
 close to each other, which were 17% and 12% for  
satisfactory
 and  
poor
  service
.  
Furthermore
, excellent was one-fourth marks in between total outcome.