Some people think tht public heath within country can be imposed by govt mking laws.discuss your opinin

Health, nomatter personal or public is reciprocal to food choices. Wellbeing of mankind is directly linked to the lifestyle ofthe person and vary from one another. Score of people have faith in that government should intervene to make solid rules and legislations to implement healthy food options. However, bunch of people hold strong believe in that what one should eatand drink is an independent choice of the persn himself. This essay will articularize and reel off fact and findings of healthy eating habits and their impact on one's life and how the food regulatory authorities can make road map to decline the adverse effects of unhealthy non hygienic food. The latter part of essay will spell put and weigh out both thoughts with day to day examples to make ot more lucid. Legislators could make and impose laws regarding the availability of unhealthy food bu what to eat, when to eat and how much to consume is wholy personal choice. However, the governing body can only make a layout and prerequisite regarding food availbility. For example, sugary drinks ave a debilitating effect on growing children leading to a major cause of obesity. In addition, energy sugar rich drinks cause ceetain injurious debilitating effects on growing minds and body causing addictive behaviour. What government should do in this disturbing scenario? ? There should be a law to be imposed in schools, universities, colleges that no cold carbonated drinks can be sold to under 15. Thats one way to tackle the rising issue while on the otherhand media compaigns and health education can also catch the eye of both adults and young. The trend of healthy can be set by celebrities and can be a motivation to the young and dilemma of the current day can be looked over. As a matter of fact, if the seller of saturated fatty food chains are heavily taxed by the government, even then there will a drastic decline in the sales and free availability. On the other side of rope, since in a liberal society personal freedom is a vital human right, some fellows believe in and staunch to the idea that the persom should be responsible himself what he can eat and what he cannot. But, putting a block, that you have to eat this and that is not a good idea as well as its like depriving one from his basic human right of selecting the food he wants to consume. In this modern era of urbanizatuon and technology, where every informatiom is just a click away, one can watch out for himself. Moreover, creatinng barriers to choices and introducing such kind of laws and acts can bring up distress and dissatisfaction in the society which may possibly lead to protests. I agree wuth the choice that one should be health educated by seminars, social and print media and then the person should be left alone with the choice he wants to make for himself. Concluding the whole thing, even though the government is vigilant enough to control the dietry habits of its fellowmen through taxation, laws amd restrictions, decline in public health expenditure won't be only outcome. This legislative inplementation on the nation can go sideways as well creating widespread protests and shutdown against the government hurting and depriving basic human rights. For that reason, nutrition and diet decision are better to be left upto well informed individuals.