Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Percentage Change in price of housing in five different cities

Percentage Change in price of housing in five different cities pKVD9
The bar chart compares the average prices of housings in five different cities (New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and Landon) in 1990-1995 and in 1996-2002 with the average prices in 1989. Overall it can be seen a significant drop in most of the cities in the first period of time, the next time frame experienced a reversal of this trend in most of the locations. In 1990-1995, the average housing prices of three countries, namely New York, Tokyo and London, were found as 5% to 7. 5% lower than in 1989. On the contrary, the costs of houses in Madrid and Frankfurt were slightly higher, by approximately 2% to 2. 5% respectively. Turning to 1996-2002, the prices looked very different. Madrid and Frankfurt kept higher as compare to 1989 but while in Madrid they were now 4% higher and in Frankfurt they were only 2% above 1989 level. Tokyo was the only city which showed the negative territory, prices were still low than in 1989, standing at -5%. The most noticeable changes were occurred in New York and London with the former seeing the average price 5% above 1989 level, the exact opposite of the previous time frame. In London, the sharpest rise, 12%higher, can be found from 1989 level. The bar chart compares the average prices of housings in five different cities (New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and Landon) in 1990-1995 and in 1996-2002 with the average prices in 1989. Overall it can be seen a significant drop in most of the cities in the first period of time, the next time frame experienced a reversal of this trend in most of the locations. In 1990-1995, the average housing prices of three countries, namely New York, Tokyo and London, were found as 5% to 7. 5% lower than in 1989. On the contrary, the costs of houses in Madrid and Frankfurt were slightly higher, by approximately 2% to 2. 5% respectively. Turning to 1996-2002, the prices looked very different. Madrid and Frankfurt kept higher as compare to 1989 but while in Madrid they were now 4% higher and in Frankfurt they were only 2% above 1989 level. Tokyo was the only city which showed the negative territory, prices were still low than in 1989, standing at -5%. The most noticeable changes were occurred in New York and London with the former seeing the average price 5% above 1989 level, the exact opposite of the previous time frame. In London, the sharpest rise, 12%higher, can be found from 1989 level.
The bar chart
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
compares
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of housings in five
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
(New
York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and Landon) in 1990-1995 and in 1996-2002 with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
in 1989.
Overall
it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
a significant drop in most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
in the
first
period of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
, the
next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
frame
experienced a reversal of this trend in most of the locations.

In 1990-1995, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
housing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of three countries,
namely
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
New
York, Tokyo and London, were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
found
as 5% to 7. 5% lower than in 1989.
On the contrary
, the costs of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
in Madrid and Frankfurt were
slightly
higher, by approximately 2% to 2. 5%
respectively
.

Turning to 1996-2002, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
looked
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
. Madrid and Frankfurt
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
higher
Comparison requires "than", not 'then' nor 'as'.
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
compare
to 1989
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
while in Madrid they were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
4% higher and in Frankfurt they were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
2%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
above
1989
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
. Tokyo was the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
city which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
territory,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
were
still
Use "lower" to make a comparison with this adjective.
low
than in 1989, standing at -5%.

The most noticeable
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
were occurred
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
New
York and London with the former seeing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
5%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
above
1989
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
, the exact opposite of the previous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
frame
. In London, the sharpest rise, 12%higher, can be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
found
from 1989
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
. The bar chart
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
compares
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of housings in five
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
(New
York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and Landon) in 1990-1995 and in 1996-2002 with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
in 1989.
Overall
it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
a significant drop in most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
in the
first
period of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
, the
next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
frame
experienced a reversal of this trend in most of the locations.

In 1990-1995, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
housing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of three countries,
namely
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
New
York, Tokyo and London, were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
found
as 5% to 7. 5% lower than in 1989.
On the contrary
, the costs of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
in Madrid and Frankfurt were
slightly
higher, by approximately 2% to 2. 5%
respectively
.

Turning to 1996-2002, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
looked
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
. Madrid and Frankfurt
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
higher
Comparison requires "than", not 'then' nor 'as'.
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
compare
to 1989
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
while in Madrid they were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
4% higher and in Frankfurt they were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
2%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
above
1989
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
. Tokyo was the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
city which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
territory,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
were
still
Use "lower" to make a comparison with this adjective.
low
than in 1989, standing at -5%.

The most noticeable
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
were occurred
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
New
York and London with the former seeing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
5%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
above
1989
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
, the exact opposite of the previous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
frame
. In London, the sharpest rise, 12%higher, can be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
found
from 1989
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Percentage Change in price of housing in five different cities

Academic
  American English
7 paragraphs
420 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Percentage Change in price of housing in five different cities