Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Comparision of Different Kinds of Energy Production in France

Comparision of Different Kinds of Energy Production in France AYkX
The pie charts designated above illustrate the comparison between the proportions of different types of energy production pursued in France in two discrete years of 1995 and 2005. As delineated in the pie charts, Coal accounted for the highest proportions of energy production across both years while Other forms of energy accounted for the lowest percentages. Coal and Gas jointly accounted for more than half of the energy production in France across both charts. Conversely, Nuclear, Petrol, and Other assortments of energy production generated subsidiary proportions of energy production. The energy produced by Coal accounted for 29. 80% in 1995 and exhibited an imperceptible escalation to 30. 93% in 2005. Concomitantly, energy generated by Gas accounted for 29. 63% in 1995 and displayed a marginal increase to 30. 32% in 2005. Furthermore, energy generated by petrol represented 29. 27% of the energy production in 1995 and plummeted perceptibly to 19. 55% in 2005. On the contrary, Nuclear Energy experienced prominent elevations, escalating from 6. 40% to 10. 10% in 1995 and 2005 respectively. Ultimately, Other sources of energy induced the highest elevations, advancing from 4. 905 in 1995 to 9. 10% in 2005. Conclusively, there have been imperceptible changes in energy production across the phase of 10 years. Production of multiple variants of energy has escalated except Petrol, which has plunged by approximately 10%. Ultimately, it is also worth noticing that conventional sources of energy experienced stagnant development in energy production, while Other sources such as Non-Conventional sources encountered increasing favourability.
The pie charts designated above illustrate the comparison between the proportions of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
pursued in France in two discrete years of 1995 and 2005.

As delineated in the pie charts, Coal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
accounted
for the highest proportions of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
across both years while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Other
forms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
accounted
for the lowest percentages. Coal and Gas
jointly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
accounted
for more than half of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in France across both charts.
Conversely
, Nuclear, Petrol, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Other
assortments of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
generated subsidiary proportions of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produced by Coal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
accounted
for 29. 80% in 1995 and exhibited an imperceptible escalation to 30. 93% in 2005.
Concomitantly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated by Gas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
accounted
for 29. 63% in 1995 and displayed a marginal increase to 30. 32% in 2005.
Furthermore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated by petrol represented 29. 27% of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in 1995 and plummeted
perceptibly
to 19. 55% in 2005.
On the contrary
, Nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Energy
experienced prominent elevations, escalating from 6. 40% to 10. 10% in 1995 and 2005
respectively
.
Ultimately
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
induced the highest elevations, advancing from 4. 905 in 1995 to 9. 10% in 2005.

Conclusively
, there have been imperceptible
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
across the phase of 10 years.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Production
of multiple variants of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
has escalated except Petrol, which has plunged by approximately 10%.
Ultimately
, it is
also
worth noticing that conventional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
experienced stagnant development in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
such as Non-Conventional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
encountered increasing
Possible spelling mistake found.
favourability
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Comparision of Different Kinds of Energy Production in France

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
251 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Comparision of Different Kinds of Energy Production in France