Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader

TPO 38 Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader RNnRQ
There is no shortage of opinion on whether ability of leading others is made with nurture or nature factors. In my opinion, individuals can be taught to become leader rather than being defined as their birth. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. Firstly, Some leaders of the previous time are born in the bourgeois or low class family, which means they have not any unique gene or nature behavior related to the leading people. Therefore, they studied how to persuade and control others during lifetime since their nature was analogous to their behavior of parents who had no gene. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been influenced by my own personal experience. When I was thirteen years old, professor made me class leader despite the fact that my forefathers have never been chief. Although it was arduous for me to tell others what they should do, I learned to how I can persuade others to follow my advice thanks to my savvy. Drawing from my own experience, people who were born in substandard family can study how to be leader by gaining knowledge and practicing. Secondly, In previous time, the princes started governing the region after the demise of former kings because their natural behavior is thought to be excellent as their ancestors. Unfortunately, many kings of ancient nations failed to perform their duty successfully, which led to the beating of the country. By contrast, great nations are established by the individuals who were not sons of king but folks. To be more specific, in the thirteenth century, Genghis khan established the great Mongolia although he was confronting difficulties associated with impoverished life. Though he and his son were great commanders and kings, the empire started losing its power from the time when his grandson started regulating the empire. In conclusion, the king from the notable family failed to govern the nation which was founded by the man who was having inferior life. I am of the opinion that being leader is not aptitude but ability which can be learnt. This is because people from substandard family leads other successfully while individuals whose forefathers are aristocracy fail to control others.
There is no shortage of
opinion
on whether ability of leading others
is made
with nurture or nature factors. In my
opinion
, individuals can
be taught
to become
leader
rather
than
being defined
as their birth. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these
ideas
in the subsequent paragraphs.

Firstly
,
Some
leaders
of the previous time
are born
in the bourgeois or low
class
family
, which means they have not any unique gene or nature behavior related to the leading
people
.
Therefore
, they studied how to persuade and control others during lifetime since their nature was analogous to their behavior of parents
who
had no gene. I
have to
admit that my
opinion
on this matter has
been influenced
by my
own
personal experience. When I was thirteen years
old
, professor made me
class
leader
despite the fact that my forefathers have never been chief. Although it was arduous for me to
tell
others what they should do, I learned to how I can persuade others to follow my advice thanks to my savvy. Drawing from my
own
experience,
people
who
were born
in substandard
family
can study how to be
leader
by gaining knowledge and practicing.

Secondly
, In previous time, the princes
started
governing the region after the demise of former
kings
because
their natural behavior is
thought
to be excellent as their ancestors. Unfortunately,
many
kings
of ancient nations failed to perform their duty
successfully
, which led to the beating of the country. By contrast, great nations
are established
by the individuals
who
were not sons of
king
but
folks. To be more specific, in the thirteenth century,
Genghis khan
established the great Mongolia although he was confronting difficulties associated with impoverished life. Though he and his son were great commanders and
kings
, the empire
started
losing its power from the time when his grandson
started
regulating the empire.
In conclusion
, the
king
from the notable
family
failed to govern the nation which
was founded
by the
man
who
was having inferior life.

I am of the
opinion
that being
leader
is not aptitude
but
ability which can be
learnt
. This is
because
people
from substandard
family
leads
other
successfully
while individuals whose forefathers are aristocracy fail to control others.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay TPO 38 Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
377 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: