Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The article indicates two benefits of shorten the five workdays to four days.

The article indicates two benefits of shorten the five workdays to four days. KwYD1

The article indicates two benefits of shorten the five workdays to four days. This motion would benefit the individual, the companies and the society. First, shorten the work time would make the employees be more efficient and make less mistakes. And this would let them have more leisure time to enjoy with their family. Second, because the employees would be more efficient, companies would make more profit. Third, it'll also solve the problem of unemployment for the whole society. In the lecture, the man announced three reasons to against the statement in the article. Firstly, the change of a five days’ workday system to a four days’ workday system wouldn't make the companies to make bigger profit. In fact, the cost would be higher than before, because the company has to spend more on employee training and medical, as well as more space for workers and more computers. Secondly, companies may not hire more employees, and they would require them to be more productive and more efficient. The company may extend the working time of four days’ employees to get the same output of the five days. So, additional jobs may not be offered, and it would make the working time more unpleasant. Furthermore, the employees who works four days a week could face more risks than the original five days’ employees. During an economic downturn, these workers would be more vulnerable to lose their jobs.

The article indicates two benefits of shorten the five workdays to four days. This motion would benefit the individual, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 and the society. First
, shorten the work You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 would You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturecomposeprepareformproducecause
make
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 be more efficient and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturecomposeprepareformproducecause
make
Did you mean "fewer"? The noun mistakes is countable.fewer
less
 mistakes. And this would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
let
 them have more leisure You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 to enjoy with their family. Second, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 would be more efficient, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 would You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturecomposeprepareformproducecause
make
 more profit. Third, it'll also
 solve the problem of unemployment for the whole society.

In the lecture, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualresidentcitizen
man
 announced three reasons to against the statement in the article.

Firstly
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
 of a five days’ workday system to a four days’ workday system wouldn't You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturecomposeprepareformproducecause
make
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturecomposeprepareformproducecause
make
 bigger profit. In fact, the cost would be higher than This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:oughts to
has to
 spend more on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 training and medical, as well
 as more space for workers and more computers.

Secondly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 may not hire more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
, and they would require them to be more productive and more efficient. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 may extend the working You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 of four days’ You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 the same output of the five days. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, additional jobs may not be offered
, and it would You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanufacturecomposeprepareformproducecause
make
 the working You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpointgenerationpastsecondturnspace
time
 more unpleasant.

Furthermore
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 who Did you mean "work"? Alternatively, check whether the singular of 'employees' should be used.work
works
 four days a week could face more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsdangers
risks
 than the original five days’ You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
. During an economic downturn, these workers would be more vulnerable to lose their jobs. 