Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

smoking in public areas should be ban by the government or vice-versa

smoking in public areas should be ban by the government or vice-versa 0AwGQ

It has long been a subject of discussion whether smoking in public areas should be ban by the government or vice-versa. In my opinion, the former notion has several strong elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments. My viewpoint has a myriad of arguments. The most perceptible one, to start with, lies in the fact that the majority of the government prohibited to smoke in public places in order to maintain a safe and clean environment. Not only does it reveal some astonishing figures that prove the point of having smoke near schools and libraries would affect children's health and character, but it also encourages one to consider more details further down the track which gives transparent and logical reasoning to the people of today's world about their health concern. For instance, doctors reported that passive smokers are more affected than active smokers. Self-evidently, all these merits stand people in good stead, as far as their health is concerned. Another vital facet of the argument is that, based on some real-time facts and figures, 70% of lung cancer caused by tobacco smoking. Besides a few perks, it is up to the authorities to educate people and allow them to take a sensible decision. Therefore, it is quite evident why many are in favour of my stance. From what has been discussed, one can conclude that the benefits of banning smoke in public places by the government are indeed too great to ignore. The government can suggest their people use the smoking zone in public places.

It has long been a subject of discussion whether smoking in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 areas should be Did you mean  "banned"?banned
ban
 by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 or vice-versa. In my opinion, the former notion has several strong elements that deserve attention and I will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interpret
explain
 why using pertinent arguments.

My viewpoint has a myriad of arguments. The most perceptible one, to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 with, lies in the fact that the majority of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 prohibited to smoke in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 places in order to maintain a safe and clean environment. Not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 does it reveal This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 astonishing figures that prove the point of having smoke near schools and libraries would affect children's health and character, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it also
 encourages one to consider more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
further
 down the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitor
track
 which gives transparent and logical reasoning to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :this day and agenowadays
today
's world about their health concern. For instance
, doctors reported that passive smokers are more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :impacted
affected
 than active smokers. Self-evidently
, all these merits stand You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 stead, as far as their health is concerned
.

Another vital facet of the argument is that, based on This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 real-time facts and figures, 70% of lung cancer caused by tobacco smoking. Besides
 a few perks, it is up to the authorities to educate You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
allow
 them to take a sensible decision. Therefore
, it is quite evident why This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 are in Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 of my stance.

From what has been discussed
, one can conclude that the benefits of banning smoke in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 places by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 are indeed
 too great to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :neglect
ignore
. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 can suggest their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 the smoking zone in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 places. 